YTSEJAM Digest 2708
Today's Topics:
1) DIE!!!
by george.farber@juno.com (George Farber)
2) Mr Wilson - KX
by "DJW" <DJW_at_NEON@smtpgate.walker.com>
3) can i get a witness????????
by Thrak75@aol.com
4) Defending Your Life
by JE78674@ltu.edu
5) Put it in your happy box
by caber1@concentric.net
6) Re: The New SONGS
by Rogerio Brito <rbrito@ant116.cce.usp.br>
7) Progday 97,
by Buck Stodgers <andrew.t.forcier@prudential.com>
8) FAQ STUFF: Please read
by The Digital Man <cmerlo@uvm-gen.emba.uvm.edu>
9) Re: YTSEJAM digest 2694 (NDTC)
by coghlanm@ix.netcom.com
10) I'm Out of Control!
by Adam Barnhart <adamb@cfmc.com>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 1997 11:25:49 EDT
From: george.farber@juno.com (George Farber)
To: ytsejam@ax.com
Subject: DIE!!!
Message-ID: <19970616.013519.7511.0.george.farber@juno.com>
YOU SPOONFED US SATURDAY MORNING MOUTHFULS OF MAGGOTS AND LIES DISGUISED
IN YOUR SUGARY BREAKFAST CEREALS. THESE PLATES YOU MADE US CLEAN WERE
FILLED WITH YOUR FEARS. THESE THINGS HAVE HARDENED IN OUR SOFT PINK
BELLIES. WE ARE WHAT YOU HAVE MADE US. WE HAVE GROWN UP WATCHING YOUR
TELEVISION. WE ARE A SYMPTOM OF YOUR CHRISTIAN AMERICA, THE BIGGEST SATAN
OF ALL. THIS IS YOUR WORLD IN WHICH WE GROW. AND WE WILL GROW TO HATE
YOU.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 97 16:52:46 PDT
From: "DJW" <DJW_at_NEON@smtpgate.walker.com>
To: ytsejam@ax.com
Subject: Mr Wilson - KX
Message-ID: <9706078682.AA868290989@smtpgate.walker.com>
Hi all...
partha "cynical fuck" mukhopadhyay mentioned Mr Wilson by Kings X...
I may be completely wrong but I thought this song was about not eating
meat - I think it's from the sheep's point of view.
Hey - lets get the 'Jam back on track!
Dave (a UK Jammer).
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 12:17:17 -0400 (EDT)
From: Thrak75@aol.com
To: ytsejam@ax.com
Subject: can i get a witness????????
Message-ID: <970707121709_375954233@emout13.mail.aol.com>
In a message dated 7/7/97 12:12:27, you wrote:
>| > From: Brandon Elhai <belhai1@gl.umbc.edu>
>| > Subject: Re: the greatest irony
>| >
>| > No...A change of seasons came out on September 19th.
you know, i didn't even catch that. thanks for the info, brandon.
now YO!!!!!! CHECK THIS OUT! SOME MUTHAFUCKER GIVE A SUCKA A HAND!
can someone confirm or deny to me once and for all that km is playing with
fates on the new tour? i've heard nothing about it, and i really want to
know....thank you.
>| Ah, but how many ACOS's could one listen to before the September 23rd
>| release date for the new album? Keep in mind that if the last one goes
>| over into the 23rd, like "it won't end until 12:06am on Sept. 23," it's
>| okay, it still counts towards the total.
>
>4883 give or take power outages...plus the standard disclaimer.
>
>oh, yeah. i'm back everyone.
>
>
>john (saveur on IRC)
you're one sick fuck, muthafucker.
fuck all you healthy people.
ytsegoon
**************************************************************************
david y. kobayashi
thrak75@aol.com
"i'm afraid of americans, i'm afraid of the world. i'm afraid i can't help
it. i'm afraid i can't." d. bowie
**************************************************************************
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 1997 12:29:34 -0400 (EDT)
From: JE78674@ltu.edu
To: YTSEJAM@ax.com
Subject: Defending Your Life
Message-ID: <01IKYEDJ6NV68WW939@LTU.EDU>
Hello....turned on the T.V. this weekend and watched this movie called
"Defending Your Life" 1991, starring Albert Brooks and Maryl Streep.
I'll be honest, I'm not one for getting into movies too much beyond
the entertainment value, but this movie made some huge sense to me.
I mean, it was a great comedy, but it had this great plot to it that
wound up teaching a lesson. I HIGHLY suggest that you should watch this
movie, I think you could get something out of it.
Later,
Jeff E.
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 1997 11:48:40 -0700
From: caber1@concentric.net
To: ytsejam@ax.com
Subject: Put it in your happy box
Message-ID: <33C1391E.4BB5@concentric.net>
Hi everyone,
I've been posting too much the past couple of days. And to settle down
everyone, I've been trying to think "good" thoughts. So here goes...
> From: "Trevor W. Hoit" <TrevorW@ms.kallback.com>
> Subject: RE: Bounty Hunters, Garden Utensils, Jalapenos
> >Hey, how come no one's ever named a band after something from Star Wars?
> >Or HAVE they???
> >Yep. There's a band called Red Five as in "Red Five Leader, I've got you
> >covered", and one called
> >Nerfherder, Leah calls someone an immature nerfherder or something like that.
You guys got me thinking about the old Star Wars News Letter I used to
get. It would have this section about where "star wars words" would come
up. And one time they had streets, and one of them was 'Banta' place.
Its a street in a hometown. Only about 2 blocks from me. And if you
don't remember the bantas...
---> From: nga@software-ag.de (Neil Gallop) > Subject: Christian bands
> After all the latest talk about christian bands, I decided to take a look at the > lyrics in my King's X and Galactic Cowboys albums. Sure enough, the texts look > like real christian stuff, and the CDs were binned immediately. I could have > taken them to the used CD shop, but I don't want to expose anybody else to this > sort of stuff.
I think it was that YtseGoon who did this last. I have a simple question how can people have all these "christian" CDs, and not know it. I mean, jeez aren't those bastard christians trying to shove it down your throat? :) Just kidding, it's just funny because you changed your opinion about the music after you had already made up your mind. > Why did I resort to such radical measures? Quite simple: I consider Christianity > (and the large section that calls itself Roman Catholic in particular) to be > the most oppressive, anti-democratic, intolerant, deceitful organization of the > last 2000 years.
Actually, those stupid Romans messed up with Jesus' birthday. Really the year 0 is 6 AD. So, this year is 2003. That's 3 more years of the most oppressive, ani-democratic, intolerant, deceitful organization! :)
> If you want to try and prove me wrong, feel free to > take this to private e-mail, and I will back up my objections with hard facts > from official church documents.
Cool did you mug the Pope, or something? ;) Everyone should really use privite email if you're actually doing the talk with Neil. But since I'm just fooling around, it's okay. ;)
---
> From: wjwomack@tddeng00.fnts.com (Wade J. Womack) > Subject: Re: Altura - Magna Carta
> MC is doing us all a great service by giving young, up-and-coming prog > artists a commercial outlet. I am eagerly awaiting the Levin, Stevens and > Bozzio project. Long live Magna Carta ! :)
I forget how I heard this but, it's kind of sad, really. Someone was comparing Magna Carta with Relativity(sp?). And how MC'll flood the market with similar bands. And when the market goes sour for progressive music(didn't that happen already? ;) ) the ones to suffer are the musicians... :(
---
> From: Nigel Bridgeman <nigelb@powerup.com.au> > Subject: Mumblings and Jumblings > 2. There's going to be a DT album released in just over two months. Why > aren't we talking about this?
Go to http://www.rsabbs.com/dt then click on the news links, and you'll have all that we know. Single CD, it's called Falling into Infinity, bunch of song titles, FW is playing demos of DT's songs in the beginning of their concerts(well that's not there not its true! ), and last but not least MP is cool for telling us any of this! :)
---
> From: caber1@concentric.net > Subject: Non-prog; Remember that time when...; whiny old bastard; my favorite DT moment
> John McCabe > caber1@concentric.net > > ------------------------------ > > End of YTSEJAM Digest 2707 > **************************
I remember the last time I got an EoJ was my first post. And I was saying something about being a freak, and I also messing around with the ending of the jam(End of YTSEJAM Digest xxxx, yeah that thing). And when it was posted I quoted some essay sized post, with me mumbling something about freaks for a line or two, and two EoJ .sigs. And Bafu replied with something like he sure is a freak, he got 2 EoJs. :)
"A pedestrian hit me and went under my car." Accident Reports from Insurance Forms
John McCabe caber1@concentric.net
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 13:46:42 -0300 (EST) From: Rogerio Brito <rbrito@ant116.cce.usp.br> To: Multiple recipients of list <ytsejam@ax.com> Subject: Re: The New SONGS Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95q.970707133658.19739A-100000@ant116.cce.usp.br>
On Mon, 7 Jul 1997, Richard James wrote:
> only one question for the people who saw the fix show > > do somebody can make a brief review of the 5 songs that they played ? > (that one is progressive, that one is "accessible", > is the songs are "awake" sound or IW SOUND)
Ok! Finally some DT content here! Incredible. Let's make the band proud of having a list about them that really talks about them.
To get to the point, I think that the songs still have some "Awake" feel and less "Images and Words" (I consider "Images and Words" to be much more progressive than "Awake" -- I consider "Awake" almost plain heavy metal).
But these songs are a bit longer and definitely different. The other songs not present on the Fix for 96 shows are "Where are you now" and "Raise the Knife". Good songs, but nothing like "Take the Time". The only thing about "Raise the Knife" that I know is that it is a relatively long instrumental (about 11 minutes) and it is ok. But I don't know if they'll put vocals on it or not (any information on this is welcome).
I mean, the songs were good, but I think that I have not heard a song such as "A Change of Seasons" or "Pull Me Under" or "Take the Time" or "Learning to Live" that caught all my attention to it. But I must say that I have only heard to most of these songs two or three times. I think that the best is "Burning my Soul", but again, my copy of the Ff96 is nothing brilliant. No song I heard was promptly memorizable as the ones I listed above (or should I say "catchy"?).
Well, but since I don't like one sided comments to my questions, I'd like to hear the other jammers exposing their comments about the new "Falling into Infinity".
Hope to hear from you soon, Roger...
-- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Rogerio Brito - rbrito@ime.usp.br - http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito Undergraduate Computer Science Student - "Windows? Linux and X!" Bootleg/trade page: http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/bootleg.html "Life is ours, we live it our way (...) / And nothing else matters" James Hetfield (Metallica), Nothing Else Matters =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 07 Jul 1997 13:07:06 -0400 From: Buck Stodgers <andrew.t.forcier@prudential.com> To: ytsejam@ax.com Subject: Progday 97, Message-ID: <199707071706.AA02147@gateway2.prudential.com>
Hello,
To the guy who was asking about going to Progday 97: count me in! I'll only be a couple of hours from it by that time! As long as I don't have to work, and can afford it after my move. BTW, the website is:
http://www.hrzdata.com/progday/
Take a look for band and location information. Will the Ytsevan be making an excursion for the occassion? -- ______________________________________________________________ "Luminous beings are we, not this crude matter..." -Yoda, the Jedi Master ______________________________________________________________ Andrew Forcier a.k.a. Buck Stodgers Maintainer of the List of Ytse-Traders of Repute; To submit names or request a copy, mailto:andrew.forcier@prudential.com To view the list: http://www.ime.usp.br/~rbrito/ytselist.txt -------------------------------------------------------------- --List Manager-- The Peppermint Tribe, the Saigon Kick Mailing List For info, check out: http://garnet.acns.fsu.edu/~rfm5570/ for e-mail inquiries, mailto:andrew.t.forcier@prudential.com **************************************************************
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 13:05:14 -0400 (EDT) From: The Digital Man <cmerlo@uvm-gen.emba.uvm.edu> To: A Pleasant Shade of Ytse <ytsejam@ax.com> Cc: distribution.@ax.com; (see end of body) Subject: FAQ STUFF: Please read Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.96.970707124802.26693M-100000@griffin.emba.uvm.edu>
Hey, folks. Just writing to let you know that the FAQ is in the midst of an update (which I should be done with by tonight or tomorrow), and to ask you all a question.
There are currently two versions of the FAQ: an HTML version (mirrored throughout the world) and a text-only version. I would like to make the HTML version nicer to look at (and a little easier to read) by doing away with the <pre> tags that wrap it. This change would make it virtually impossible, however (or at least too hard for me to deal with) to maintain both the HTML and text-only versions.
So, here is the question. Is it necessary to maintain a text-only version of the FAQ? Getting rid of the text-only version would have the following effects:
No effect on web readers Virtually impossible to retrieve a readable version by FTP or e-mail Less for me to do No way to post the FAQ to alt.music.dream-theater (I would post update notices instead) Less disk space overall devoted to the FAQ
Please e-mail me privately (with a subject something like "FAQ Survey") and let me know whether you think a text-only version is necessary, and why. Thanks. -d
------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Digital Man \|/ ____ \|/ Secretary & Webmaster cmerlo@cs.uvm.edu "@'/ ,. \`@" UVM Comp Sci Student Assn d-man@dreamt.org /_| \__/ |_\ "He won't need a bed http://www.emba.uvm.edu/~cmerlo \__U_/ He's a digital man" - Peart ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Maintainer of the Official Dream Theater Frequently Asked Questions List http://www.emba.uvm.edu/~cmerlo/dtfaq.html
%%% overflow headers %%% Cc: FAQ updates -- Jennifer Albert <AirDance@aol.com>, Matthew Schnoor <schnoor@SpiritOne.com>, Michael Burstin <mikeb@cs.brandeis.edu>, Emmanuel CLEMENCE <Eclemence@bplorraine.fr>, Geir Botterli <geirb@hekta.iet.hist.no>, HyunSoo Cheon <hscheon@sunlight.yonsei.ac.kr>, Jeff Chew <jc309@columbia.edu>, Joao Aurelio Telles da Rocha <rocha@bsb.nutecnet.com.br>, Michael Kizer <mkizer@indirect.com>, "Miguel Farah F." <miguel@ns.rdc.cl>, Nigel Bridgeman <nigelb@powerup.com.au>, Scotch <anthem@virginia.edu>, Ryan Skadberg <skadz@dreamt.org> %%% end overflow headers %%%
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 12:26:46 -0500 (CDT) From: coghlanm@ix.netcom.com To: ytsejam@ax.com Subject: Re: YTSEJAM digest 2694 (NDTC) Message-ID: <19977712923241@ix.netcom.com>
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
--oeuoliwusevrmhacjdeylcaajnoppe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
--oeuoliwusevrmhacjdeylcaajnoppe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; name="resp"
My one and only reply to responses to my post:
:) Note: some responses may contain sarcasm and dry humor.
*The term "gay-bashing" no longer refers only to violence. It now refers *to any hateful action against people because they're gay. For instance, *wishing that all gay people would go back into the closet and lock the *door is an example of gay bashing. Prick.
Now we've gone from "gay-bashing" meaning inflicting physical harm on homosexuals to "gay-bashing" meaning saying something not very nice about gay people. Oh My! Then we can coin another new buzz word "Michael-bashing". I know that doesn't count because it's "OK" to bash anyone who doesn't agree with you just don't tease the gays - they're very sensitive. And don't say anything about pediphiles either, they can't help it - they were born that way. I understand now!!
*>Mr Coghlan, why not just fuck off to heaven and leave us to sin in *>peace? *Thanks Graham. You so eloquently put into words what I think many people *think about this loser. Couldn't have said it better myself. :) *Scott
You guys may become something someday, you only need to develop your own thoughts and opinions - usually that happens when you become a man if indeed you ever really become a man.
*threw at XXXXXXX, and keep them as ammo... we'll need them to defend our *beliefs and lifestyles as the world slides further toward the sewer.
This proves that there are rational, intelligent, and mature people on this list. This man suggests that the direction of our society's morals are on a downward spiral. Whatever would make him say such a thing?
* I didn't see Coghlan spewing hate towards anybody. If I recall,
The reason you didn't see me spewing hate was because you can read AND comprehend what I wrote.
* And if you all think we're pushing our beliefs onto you, it's no *different than say King's X or Galactic Cowboys. Well, I guess it *is, because they're mass producing CDs, and all of you are buying *them, and even publishing the lyrics of some songs here. If we
Man! This guy is asking to get kicked off the list! Better quit while you're ahead. Take if from me, it is hard to kick against the goads. The truth generally is not welcome here - walk on eggshells. ;)
*From: Brandon Elhai <belhai1@gl.umbc.edu> *> "Don't put forth an effort to be politically correct"? No, Mike, you're *> an ignorant, hateful, tasteless asshole who has no place on this list.
*Chill out. He's stating his opinion. Nothing wrong with that.
Sorry Brandon - you're wrong! You forgot that he's talking about Michael Coghlan. Yea - he's that Christian fanatic that wants to try to talk about life instead of death and good instead of evil and restraint instead of abandon. He's one of those pukes I can't stand because he thinks he's so good, if fact better than everyone on this list. Every post I see a post from this Bible thumper is God-related in some way. We got em kicked off once - we'll do it again.
*Another clear example of jammers not willing to deal with other peoples' *opinions.
Wrong again, :) this is not "peoples opinions" this is Michael Coghlan's opinions - big difference. You must be new to the list.:)
*From: Mark Bredius <bredius@globalxs.nl> * lurking on this list, 'cuz this shit would probably make them puke. * Are you guys sure this is the same list that was responsible for DT * getting the chance to record ACoS ?
Yes, but what would make them puke? Your brown-nosing comments, Michael- bashing, or my supposed gay-bashing or option D all the above or E none of the above?
*it: Being gay *is* a matter of choice. There. I realize this will *probably get me a few enemies, and I'm really a nice guy, but I can't let *this matter go by without me saying what I know to be true.
More signs of intelligence! I'm sorry about you being a nice guy, the comment you made tainted peoples view of you now. Welcome to the arena - now put on your armour.
*From: Chris Ptacek <someone@enteract.com> *If any of you think that your *Good Book or your relative morality qualifies you to condemn a sin that *causes no harm, and fosters only love, then I assure you, you've missed the *point. Whole religions miss the point. I am a Catholic. Catholicism
Sin that causes no harm? Please sneak up on reality. You have no point.
*misses the point. I am a Christian. Christianity does not miss the point *(and many non Christian religions also include understanding in their *doctrine). A man or woman who condemns true love in whatever form it comes, *is not a Christian.
Total and utter fiction.
*I think Michael Coghlan and Mike Bahr's last posts were *just about the worst drivel I've seen on this list.
You must be new to the list, you should have seen my 1995 posts!
*NO ONE ELSE'S opinion *matters when it comes to homo/heterosexuality. That's all there is to it.
Think about that mister "in-the-know" when your little child see's two men or women doing in public what is generally done by hetros and asks you what it's all about. Will you pollute your own flesh and blood's foundation of morality by saying "that's OK, they are just two people who love each other and by the way it's legal now". We are we all going with all this freedom we have?
*chromosome. If you are born a goat, you can't be slain for attempting to *chew my girlfriend's hair when she was a little girl. YOU DON'T HAVE THE
What? :|
You are an idiot and a fool if you don't make judgements about all facets of life as you travel through it. Think about this! A man with no judgement is a man with no direction. Are we taking words from the Bible WAY out of context with this "do not judge" spiel?
*And I deplore people like Coghlan who claim moral righteousness despite *their pasts of complete and utter condemnation. Hypocrisy. Mike has a *history of knocking anyone who does anything contrary to what his religion *enshrines. Now if he's to be considered a beacon of holy infallibility,
*it's coming out of your mouth, you're full of shit. This list is not a *debate for the values of sexuality and religion.
*Michael Coghlan, shut the fuck up on the religious shit. Nobody *cares. If you wanna talk religion, mail me, I'm sure you'll love what I *have to say.
Why are so many people bringing religion/God into this issue?? I didn't mention a word about religion or God, nor did I make any implications or inferences. Don't get me wrong, I'm quite honored that I would be ass- ociated with God - Thank You! Claim moral righteousness I did not. What's my history? You haven't a clue so stop lying.
*If you make this list your alter to preach your ignorance and your *indoctrination, fuck you. With a knife.
*it would be nice if the narrow minded ignorant homophobes such as *yourself would quit your pointless whining and shut the hell up
*Having a spine and being blissfully ignorant are two different things... but *hey, nothing personal towards Coghlan since he does actually listen to DT.
More comments from kids that don't know me from Adam. How old are you? Still live at home with mom and dad? Enjoy your life now, there are much tougher decisions to be made down the road, but don't shrug off wisdom and choose acceptance instead.
If I sound like your dad it's for two reasons:
1. I am a dad and a husband and I would literally give my life for my family. This is a period of life when the judgements you make will have a life-long impact.
2. I'm old enough to be a lot of you guys dads. I shared your very opinions at one time in my life. Most of my beliefs and attitudes didn't net me a enjoyable life. If I can say one thing to one person to help them avoid one of my many failures, I'll do it. All you can do is reject me - won't be the first time and it won't be my loss.
*people assuming it's a choice. The LIFESTYLE is a choice. But being gay *is NOT a choice, and how can you blame gay people for choosing the
Duh!
* Here's my view on what it's like to be gay : * * Feeling ashamed and/or confused when you find out you're gay... The * fear of what your parents will say/do when they find out or when you * tell them... Straight friends fixing you up with girls, because they * blah blah blah blah------------------------------------------------
* *I am not gay myself*, so I can only go by what I have heard, seen and
This guy is incredible. One of our next politicians.
The irony is thick in the responses I've received to my post. If you really have an open mind you'll see it. How do any of you know I'm not a reformed homosexual? I am ignorant, but how much more experience and insight do I have than you do about anything I've talked about on the jam? I've lived with gays, worked with gays and been friends with gays.
I wouldn't be too far off if I stated that I have just as much or considerately more experience with homosexuality than anyone on this list - except maybe for the homosexuals. So don't make any assumptions about my experience and ignorance. I've lived twice as long on this earth than a good part of the jammers on the list and at least ten years longer the most of you guys. Ignorance; whoever has the most loses.
Michael C. _______________________________________________________________________________
"Your having a good time baby, but that won't last. Your mind all full of things your living to fast. Go on enjoy yourself there's nobody dead - you'll need someone to help you push the needle in". Ozzy O - Hand of Doom _______________________________________________________________________________ --oeuoliwusevrmhacjdeylcaajnoppe--
------------------------------
Date: Mon, 7 Jul 1997 10:28:03 -0700 From: Adam Barnhart <adamb@cfmc.com> To: ytsejam@ax.com Subject: I'm Out of Control! Message-ID: <199707071728.KAA15402@main.cfmc.com>
Hey folks....
We've had some interesting content in here lately. You'd scarcely know this was a music-type mailing list. Then again, I don't mind this sorta thing...religion, homosexuality, political orientation, abortion. This is actually kinda cool:
>From: nga@software-ag.de (Neil Gallop) > >Why did I resort to such radical measures? Quite simple: I consider >Christianity (and the large section that calls itself Roman Catholic in >particular) to be the most oppressive, anti-democratic, intolerant, >deceitful organization of the last 2000 years. It has had blood on it's hands >from the very beginning and it's still killing people now.
I'm an Agnostic. I'm not, by virtue of that doubt, the one who should mention this, but isn't this essentially the hallmark of Western belief over that last two millenia you mention? I mean, Judaism, Christianity, and Islam, in their manifold forms, have gone bonkers killing each other and themselves for quite a long time. Perhaps that's simply the hallmark of monotheism. I mean, we've had this problem, to some extent, since Aknaton has the apple of monotheism fall on his head, which is a couple extra millenia still.
But monotheism can certainly reach back towards other religions. C.S. Lewis, probably the most prominent Christian writer of our century, refers, in "The Abolition of Man," to the single right action as "The Tao," indicating a congruence between the aforementioned western religions and those of the East. A belief which folks like Frijof Capra have bolstered over the last thirty years or so.
So the guys in King's X have a belief in some form of Gaia/God/Allah/Tao. That I don't agree with their position in the main (I'm a pretty ardently pro-choice guy) does not mean that I view their work as subversive propaganda. On the contrary, I think of them (and the Galactic Cowboys and Atomic Opera) as first-rate musicians, who've improved the quality of my life via their talent and effort.
You've said that you don't want to carry this discussion out on the list. It's probably out of place to the majority. But you do bring up a discussion that's worthwhile: how far can our favorite musicians diverge from ourselves in terms of the beliefs that the espouse. Again, I'm not a religious guy, and there IS religious undercurrent to even the work of our beloved Dream Theater. So I think, rather than off the subject, it's DAMN topical.
>From: Nigel Bridgeman <nigelb@powerup.com.au> > >1. Please cut the discussion about homosexuality.
Oh yeah, I forgot about that one. As something of a Libertarian myself, I've got to take issue with some of the homophobia that's been expressed here. I mean, I'm certainly loathe to tell you that you can't express these opinions -- I rather think discussing all of this is vital, important, and interesting. But you're wrong. Damn wrong.
The prevalent argument is that homosexuality is unnatural. If that is, in fact, the case, why do we see homosexuality throughout the animal kingdom, even among animals that are far less social than man? What is it, specifically, that is unnatural?
The other argument is, of course, that it is "immoral." And what, generally speaking, is the basis of that immorality? It is, in fact, the religion that I've previously mentioned....the bus I can't conscienably get on at this point. The immorality of homosexuality is, for most folks, rooted in the fact that two main features of homosexuality -- that it is sexuality for physical gratification and that it exists outside the confines of marriage -- lie outside most of the dominant belief systems of our era. I don't find either of these things abominable -- I, in fact, practice both -- and, based on the observations of contemporary (or otherwise) heterosexual behavior, neither does most of the population. I'm still looking for the immorality of it all.
And I usually only disagree with our esteemed Mr. Bahr slightly -- in interpretation, rather than message. But to condone homophobia as a Libertarian makes little sense to me. On a personal level, we can all express whatever dissatisfaction we have with a given issue. On a macro level, though, the Libertarian platform is quite clear on this -- homosexuals should be granted full rights under the law to do whatever the hell they want. Libertarians disagree with liberal Democrats, for the most part, on how to achieve this end, but the goal is approximately the same.
And I DON'T think most of us are expressing our opposition to homophobia in effort to be PC. Being "PC" leaves one persona non grata in virtually every social situation at this point. I'm certainly not one to mince words or avoid pissing folks off...I'm not toeing some imaginary line -- not even one drawn by Andre Marrou. I'm expressing disagreement with the notion that homosexuality is, in some way, anything more than a minority social activity. Like listening to Dream Theater.
>2. There's going to be a DT album released in just over two months. Why >aren't we talking about this?
I, personally, don't have anything to say about it. I have quite a few things, I suppose, to say about "Images and Words" and "Live at the Marquee." But I haven't yet HEARD "Lines in the Sand." I guess that's why I don't have anything more meaningful to offer than "Damn! I can't wait!"
>3. Be nice to each other. We're here to talk about and discuss Dream >Theater and other related topics. Private email can be a wonderful thing - >if you want to abuse someone for all it's worth, don't put it in the jam. >It just means you're either someone who thinks other people want to hear >it, or you're just an exhibitionist.
Or a masochist or sadist. I'm assuming I'll get some flak for this.
>The band are said to read the Ytsejam. Having a look at what is being said >recently, I doubt we're the kinds of fans they'd really like to have.
On the contrary....I'd rather be quite happy to find that my fan base was so thoughtful on a variety of issues. I'd rather have a bunch of fans that read the paper periodically than an illiterate mass of moshers. Balls and chunk is nice...but a little brainpower makes it all the more interesting.
>From: Partha Mukhopadhyay <ahtrap@umich.edu> > >as for genesis, i just (finally) got We can't Dance the other day.....just >never had the urge to do so previously, never got all that much out of the >radio songs.....but recently I been lis'nin to a lot of genesis all up and >down their career.....got a bunch of their late 70s/early 80s vinyl from a >garage sale, etc......getting excited about the new one.......
They always have those cool 10 minute tunes...even on the more commercial later pieces. "Driving the Last Spike" is just an awesome song....and the whole "Domino" piece/suite/thing on "Invisible Touch" is pretty cool. And I laugh to this day how much they pared down "Tonight, Tonight, Tonight" to get it played on the radio. It was worse than "Take The Time," man. Well...almost.
Five Gratuitous CD's: (Like this post needs to be any MORE self-indulgent) ==================================================== 1. Rush: Counterparts 2. Faith No More: The Real Thing 3. Dar Williams: Mortal City 4. The Who: Who's Next 5. Indigo Girls: Swamp Ophelia
Adam D. Barnhart adamb@cfmc.com ydnt85a@prodigy.com http://www.cfmc.com/adamb
------------------------------
End of YTSEJAM Digest 2708 **************************
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 17:59:34 EST