>
>> Ok, 'KorgX3' wrote somtehing about Pink Floyd beingSymphonic Rock and n
>ot
>> Progressive. Just to clear things up: what's the difference? I live in
>> Belgium and we have just one word which is, translated, 'symphonic Rock
>'.
>> When i set foot on the internet, I found that most english-speakers use
>> the word 'progressive' instead, so i thought that the two meant the sam
>e.
>> So could someone PLEASE explain me the difference (KorgX3, you didn't m
>ake
>> yourself clear on that one, I'm afraid...
>
>OK, I was thinking that prog deals more with alot of experimented
>sounds, time changes, and very involved themes. Symphonic I was
>refering to as something that will use some of those experimental
>sounds (I count PF's early stuff with Syd as Prog), but symphonic
>sets more of a scene. Lots of thick textures and ambiance. Not a
>whole lot, if any time changes. Just basically I guess what you
>could still call "prog lite." Pink Floyd and Marillion are what I'd
>consider a "Genuine Draft". :)
>
Symphonic Prog is a sub-genre of Progressive, but it includes many
of the "classic" prog bands (Yes, Genesis, etc).
Check out the Gibraltar Encyclopedia of Progressive Rock for the
"standard" subcategories of progressive rock (http://prog.ari.net/prog/).
Click on the "A guide to progressive sub-genres" icon to see their
definitions.
Here's their definition of Symphonic Prog:
"Characterized by lush keys/synths and very melodic vocals and usually
written like a piece of classical music - i.e. "Symphonic." Different
from Neo-progressive by being much more complicated, especially in
rhythm or scale structure.
Bands: Yes, Genesis (early), Camel, Atoll, Teru's Symphonia, etc. "
I'd tend to agree. That's what many people mean by "Symphonic Prog".
Bands like Marillion (and maybe Pink Floyd) border the neo-prog and symphonic
prog styles.
Of course, the reality is that every person has their own definition
of what prog rock is. Mostly I find myself just wanting to hear bands that
I like rather than caring what genre they belong to. It's totally subjective
anyway -- if it's a powerful song or has a great melody then it doesn't
matter what category it belongs to (pop, metal, classical, etc).
Then again, the categories at least give you an idea of what you
might like if you haven't heard the bands. So, they're worth something in
that respect. Once you try many of the bands then you'll have a better idea
of what styles you like best.
Steve
This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 17:59:16 EST