YTSEJAM Digest 4511

From:
Date: Thu Dec 17 1998 - 12:18:08 EST

  • Next message: : "YTSEJAM Digest 4512"

                                YTSEJAM Digest 4511

    Today's Topics:

      1)
     by "Todd Fostvedt" <tfostvedt@csu.org>
      2) Re: Flames Ensue. Donning
     by "Todd Fostvedt" <tfostvedt@csu.org>
      3) I am CakeHolio, I need some insults for my PollHole :)
     by Jon Parmet <jon@parmetpc.volpe.dot.gov>
      4) Go flames (No not Calgary)!
     by Jeremy Hallum <jhallum@bu-ast.bu.edu>
      5) RE: YTSEJAM digest 4510
     by "Blevins, Mike" <BlevinsM@amsc.belvoir.army.mil>
      6) Re: Go flames (No not Calgary)!
     by Lisa Marie <ytsegirl@pacbell.net>
      7) Mike Bahr saga
     by Rick Audet <Ytse@concentric.net>
      8) non musician
     by BILL HUSTON <HUSTON@IOMEGA.COM>
      9) Non-musician jammers
     by AnalogGal@aol.com
     10) Re: Flames Ensue. Donning Asbestos Coat.... (re: PM Awards)
     by AnalogGal@aol.com
     11) Missing URL
     by <dthomas@best.com>
     12) Fwd: Fw: FW: Sick
     by liquidrich@webtv.net

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 15:18:08 -0700
    From: "Todd Fostvedt" <tfostvedt@csu.org>
    To: ytsejam@axnet.net
    Message-ID: <872566DD.007A9B39.00@nd-mta01.csu.org>

    >Issac Sabetai had a long comment to make about musicianship seeming
    >to take precedence over songs. Which made me wonder: how many people
    >on the 'Jam DON'T play an instrument of any sort (or even, just
    >guitar or drums). And how many people actually listen to DT etc. just
    >for the music?
    >(by the way, I'm asking, not digging)
    >
    >Si

    I don't play any instrument, but I know good music when I hear it.(I
    think.....)

    Nigel

    ------------------------------

    Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 15:24:08 -0700
    From: "Todd Fostvedt" <tfostvedt@csu.org>
    To: ytsejam@axnet.net
    Subject: Re: Flames Ensue. Donning
    Message-ID: <872566DD.007B27DF.00@nd-mta01.csu.org>

    Jessie wrote:
    >Oh my, forbid any of you should be exposed to the opinions of another
    >group of prog metal fans! You might actually be exposed to a new band!
    >So to those of you whose interest was piqued by 'Pain of Salvation',
    >just forget it... apparently you weren't supposed to see that. We
    >certainly can't have people getting interested in other bands.

    Here, here, Jess. For people complaining about it, DON'T READ IT THEN.
    Some
    of us actually like reading about bands we've never heard of.

    Nigel

    ------------------------------

    Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 22:49:13 +0000
    From: Jon Parmet <jon@parmetpc.volpe.dot.gov>
    To: yts <ytsejam@axnet.net>
    Subject: I am CakeHolio, I need some insults for my PollHole :)
    Message-ID: <36798A69.5E65@parmetpc.volpe.dot.gov>

    I retract the comment which implied that there is something
    fundamentally wrong with the people who responded to the poll. It was
    enjoyable to use the phrase 'leaking skull', though probably not as
    enjoyable as it was for some to see that a group they hate the most was
    displayed publically as 'SHIT EATERS".

    Nonetheless, Lisa is correct, it was insulting and subjective. I'll try
    to be more objective and just attack the poll itself. Of course, we all
    know how long that'll last :)

    You knew it was coming, so here we go, smileys and all...

    Gaz:

    > The board is very well known throughout the metal world, but
    > seems not many know it it here....

    > So because some don't know of it, we are to doubt it's
    > authenticity ?
    > :)

    But since we here in our little world don't know anything about it, we
    are not allowed to comment on the results prima facia?

    I never doubted its "authenticity", just the value of the results
    presented :) Didn't like my delivery? Oh well. Call somebody who cares
    :)

    I don't even know many of the groups on there. Do I have to, in order to
    make an observation about what appears to be inconsistencies? There
    wasn't any bias as to which group *I* feel should be ranked in any
    position for any particular question. Any suggestion that there was, is
    simply that, a suggestion. How some of you have concluded that is beyond
    me. It doesn't matter what I think anyways :)

    I've posted many a time on groups other than Dream Theater (Jon Finn
    ring a bell, anyone? Jazz suggestions anyone?) only to have those
    threads quietly die out in favor of the latest "Metallica sux" thread or
    <insert any other legendary thread we all know and hate>. Anyone who
    knows me, knows life doesn't begin and end for me with Dream Theater
    (*duck* :) Seems like much of the time, people would rather engage in
    flame wars than to look for reply to meaningful content. Having seen
    many a flamewar occur on the jam, I can hoenstly say, if feels good that
    people are keeping a thread going that I triggered. Why? Because I'm
    fan, I smell, and damnit, people like me :)

    I pretty much got tired of wasting my time posting only to have the
    latest mutation of "you couldn't even begin to imagine how little you
    know about music" thread resurface. Looking at the feeding frenzy which
    has ensued, it appears like people would rather rip each other's throats
    out, than to try and actually find out what someone may have really
    meant. It's okay to say something 'eats shit' but when Johnny doesn't
    play nice, that's a whole different matter :)

    Fair enough, give 'em what they want :)

    I saw conflicting results to some of the questions. Besides Bernd, I
    picked Dream Theater because they were involved in the results with
    which I found a contradiction. It could have been Milli Vanilli and it
    would have been exactly the same. It has nothing at all to do with with
    who ranked where.

    >Yeah, but then we know it was 'rigged'

    How about a count next to each ranking including how many answered
    "other". IIRC, there's a poll which has been posted here ("Top 5 discs
    of the year" perhaps?) which included tallies along with the rankings.
    This gives meaning to the rankings by allowing people to see how many in
    the sample replied to each question and how those results are
    distributed.

    Assumption: deserving of being on a major label is a good thing, as it
    increases accesibility/availibility
    Assumption: should be in the hall of fame is a good thing

    We think Sunkist oranges don't deserve to sold by any of the major
    supermarkets.

    We think Sunkist oranges should be entered into the Hall of Fame as one
    of the best fruits in the world.

    You could be someone who:

    1) Never tasted an orange in their life
    2) Works for Sunkist
    3) Can write the chemical compound symbols for an orange on a blackboard
    4) IS an orange :)

    and still be able to look at the above two ideas and go "HUH?" Can you
    tell whether we, AS A GROUP, want an orange or not? Yeah, maybe we're
    into pain and only want things we consider to be the worst, to be the
    most accessible :)

    Perhaps the poll is not intended to reflect the views of the entire
    group. What IS the group? What does the group consist of in each
    question? Got me...

    With a tally count, including tallies for 'other' to show how many votes
    were cast for those who didn't make the ranks, we might be able to
    determine if *perhaps* those who felt DT didn't deserve to be on a major
    label, all voted for different groups (one each for example) in the
    'hall of fame' category, allowing DT to rank 1st there.

    It's entirely possible that there were a lot of categories for which a
    band/musician received 1 vote, but which was lost down in the noise.
    Without something as simple as a tally count, the results have very
    little meaning prima facia, and it's speculation as to how the answers
    were distributed.

    A pathological case: Suppose, for example, 100 people replied, 3 people
    felt DT didn't deserve to be on a major label, 50 each voted for 50
    different groups and the remaining 47 didn't even answer the question. I
    could be off base, but I don't consider DT winning that category to have
    much statistical significance, since almost 1/2 the board was excluded,
    and they only won the category by 2 votes over any other answer. To say
    something wins a category without qualifying the results causes the
    result to lose statistical significance. I'm not a statistician, so any
    stats experts feel to jump all over my shit (It's what I'm here for :)

    Mike Patrick:

    > I think all of that is clearly reflected in the poll results.

    And I think without knowing such simple things as, for example, how much
    1st place won over 2nd place, how many votes did 3rd place receive and
    how many votes did those who weren't ranked receive, the results are
    vague, ambiguous, and meaningless.

    86.7% of all statistics lie :)

    Lisa:
    > Thomas:
    > >> Lisa:
    > >>I'm guessing that if Dream Theater had swept the poll
    > >>in the #1 position, you wouldn't have anything to say.

    Me not have anything to say? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAH :) But, but, I am
    CakeHolio!

    > >I think he was saying that since there was no mention of this post for the
    > >purpose of submitting our entries, then why are we subjected to its
    > >results?

    Perhaps you meant someone else's reply. I had no problem with it being
    posted here. I never said it shouldn't be allowed to be posted here. I
    know how to use the Page Down key if I choose to ignore something, like
    Arash's signature file :P

    > I didn't read that *anywhere* in Jon's post. All I read was a lot of
    > insulting remarks, which is why I felt prompted to respond.

    Correct.

    Bernd must have felt real good when he saw that all the hard work he's
    put into what he loves most was reduced the level of 'eating shit.'
    Having spoken with Bernd on the phone in the past, it appeared to me
    that he does't take himself too seriously, and handles criticism pretty
    well. Judging from his reply on here it appears he can also take an
    insult, of which he ended up being the object, in stride.

    Germans don't do comedy, they do beer :)))

    I'll stand by the statement about putting terms like 'shit-eater' in a
    question. It produces an "interesting" effect. It goes further than to
    just facilitate criticism of a band/musician. Its intent is to "insult",
    to "push buttons." Don't mind if I push its buttons, do you? You do? Oh
    well :)

    Fire away...... :)

    Bafu:
    > If anyone cares to explain how a "major label" would be better
    > for bands like Cairo or LTE than their present label, Magna Carta,
    > please do.

    I already bought LTE, so I don't care :) Oh, what the heck, I guess you
    should be able to have my cake and eat it too, right, Bafu? :)

    Don't "major labels" have more advertising dollars to throw around?
    Aren't they backing many of the promotions for live concerts. If someone
    like Sony started promoting a series of SuperGroup concerts, don't you
    think it would help generate sales?

    > Dream Theater? I love the fact that they can tour as they do with
    > support from a "major label," because DUH, I really like seeing them
    > live.

    Who handled G3, by the way? That got more press (around here anyways)
    than many a Dream Theater show I've been to in the last 3 years.

    Regards,
    Jon

    *------------*----------------------------*--------------*
    | Jon Parmet | jon@parmetpc.volpe.dot.gov | 617-494-2851 |
    *------------*----------------------------*--------------*

    "maybe I should write it first
     and do the living later
     cuz life is always cleaner on the page" - Chromakey

    ------------------------------

    Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 17:48:53 -0500 (EST)
    From: Jeremy Hallum <jhallum@bu-ast.bu.edu>
    To: "Ytsejam: Where Dream and Flames Unite" <ytsejam@axnet.net>
    Subject: Go flames (No not Calgary)!
    Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.981217172835.27319A-100000@bu-ast.bu.edu>

    On Thu, 17 Dec 1998 Jam 4510 Various Jammers imparted:

    > From: Lisa Marie <ytsegirl@pacbell.net>
    > Subject: Re: Flames Ensue. Donning Asbestos Coat.... (re: PM Awards)
    >
    >
    > Giannotti, Nick wrote:
    > >
    > > >For the record, it was a poll for people on the Perpetual Motion
    > > >bulletin board, so of course it wouldn't be open to Ytsejam subscribers
    > > (unless
    > > >you also happen to visit the PM board). Please forgive us all for someone
    > > >forwarding the results here, and disrupting your little world.
    > >
    > > Then maybe it should have been kept there. I, for one, don't recall any
    > > offers by anyone to vote in this poll (a word that I use very loosely)
    > > posted to the 'jam.
    >
    > Again, refer to my previous post. It was a poll for the PM board,
    > designed to reflect the opinions of the people on the board. It was not
    > meant for the internet community in general. Just like KorgX3 pointed
    > out... we wouldn't want subscribers of other mailing lists voting in our
    > Ytsejam Top 98 award now would we?

            It depends, you know as well as I do, Lisa what happens when one
    list mentions one band that many people don't like...they go apeshit
    about it. On the Jam its that "M" band. On The Edge of Forever list,
    it happens to be DT. So fucking what? You don't need to ride him with a
    cat o nine tails over it. Let him have his fucking opinion for christ
    sake...I think your taking it a bit overboard. I'm surprised that you
    are digging it so deep for something so trivial, Jess. Someone piss in
    your Post Toasties this morning?

    > ------------------------------
    >
    > From: Al Balkiewicz <balkiewi@UMDNJ.EDU>
    > Subject: Re: Flames Ensue. Donning Asbestos Coat.... (re: PM Awards)

    > This whole debate is stupid in general.

            Amen brotha. Though we may not agree with the poll, it would be
    small number statistics chiming in its finest hour. Kinda like them
    polls you see lately that supposedly describe the national opinion. "So
    you surveyed 504 people with these questions, and you say that they are
    moderately ACCURATE...to 5%?" BWHAHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAAHAHAH! More like
    10-15% I'd say. Anyway....I digress.

    > ------------------------------

            Oh, and for those of you who have followed
    the Mike Bahr saga over time will likely be interested in the following
    webpage...pulled it off of alt.music.dream-theater.

                                    -jeremy

    +================================================================+
       "Who's the soapbox derby king? Who's the soapbox derby king?"
                                    Vikings WR Cris Carter to
                                    Vikings WR Randy Moss on an
                                    ESPN commercial
       Minnesota Vikings: 1998 NFC Central Divison Champs!!!!
    +================================================================+
      Jeremy Hallum, Assistant System Manager & Grad Student,
     Astronomy, Boston University/jhallum@bu.edu:::jhallum@dreamt.org

    ------------------------------

    Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 18:12:42 -0500
    From: "Blevins, Mike" <BlevinsM@amsc.belvoir.army.mil>
    To: "'ytsejam@ax.com'" <ytsejam@axnet.net>
    Subject: RE: YTSEJAM digest 4510
    Message-ID: <413835162AC9CF11AE9602070116CC5EC177A9@AMSC_NTAS>

    > >For the record, it was a poll for people on the Perpetual Motion
    > >bulletin board, so of course it wouldn't be open to Ytsejam
    > subscribers
    > (unless
    > >you also happen to visit the PM board). Please forgive us
    > all for someone
    > >forwarding the results here, and disrupting your little world.
    >
    > Then maybe it should have been kept there. I, for one, don't
    > recall any
    > offers by anyone to vote in this poll (a word that I use
    > very loosely)
    > posted to the 'jam. How convenient for those who post to PM
    > and want to
    > incite those of us on the 'jam with the results. If "the
    > Perpetual Motion
    > Awards poll was conducted by and FOR the people that post on the
    > Perpetual Motion Bulletin Board", then why were we subjected to the
    > extremely
    > opinionated results? What's even more laughable is that when someone
    > commented on the absolute absurdity of the poll, people came
    > to its defense
    > as though it were canon!
    >
    > Bah. Any so-called 'poll' that has a category named
    > 'Shit-Eater' isn't
    > worth the weight of the paper it's printed on.

    Have you been reading the same posts I have? A few things:

    1. It's not canon, it's not law, it's not even really all that accurate - I,
    for one, DID NOT vote for Shadow Gallery in all those categories - it's just
    a poll. Take from it what you may.

    (For the record, I thought Athena's "A New Religion?" kicked the crap out of
    the Shadow Gallery CD. I also thought Blind Guardian was the best band.
    That's just me, however...)

    2. Perpetual Motion (or PM, as it's usually referred to) did not say, as a
    group, "Hey, let's post this to ytsejam to see whose ass we can light up!"
    Some of the more arrogant types here may not believe this, but there are
    many PM types that DON'T EVEN KNOW WHAT THE YTSEJAM LIST IS! (Gasp! Shock!
    Horror!)

    Somebody just thought it would be a cool idea to post the results here. I
    guess that person was wrong...

    3. I think "Shit - Eater" is a totally valid category when people have A
    SENSE OF HUMOR! Some of us that have been here for a long time don't like to
    read the list much anymore, because some people are too busy making cubic
    zirconia with their ass cheeks to be any fun.

    4. I haven't heard "Younique", so I won't comment on it. I'm willing to give
    Bernd the benefit of the doubt until I do hear it, however. (This has no
    relevance at all to the rest of this post - I just thought I'd throw it in.)

    5. I've noticed a large number of the "old time" ytsejam crowd popping up at
    PM. I'm not sure why that is, but I have an idea. As backwards,
    keyboard-and-saccharine and lacking Huevos as PM may be sometimes, at least
    most of their minds are more open than the this list's have been lately. I
    know I've discovered a lot of great music through PM, and I tend to value
    the opinions of - at least some - of the people there, just as I do here.
    They key word is SOME, and while the number grows on PM, it shrinks rapidly
    on ytsejam.

    For crissakes, relax, people. I'll say it again - it's just a poll. It
    doesn't have to disrupt your entire universe - ignore at will.

    I'm sure Mike Bahr (where is he these days, anyway?) would agree...

    BTW, if any of you that don't hate me now would like to know about my band,
    check out www.division-usa.com. We're not DT, we don't play DT songs, and I
    think we pretty much suck, but I thought I'd plug us anyway.

    I expect to see all of the DC locals Saturday night - even if I have to beg.
    If you can't come out to the show - distance, anger, whatever - at least
    listen to Coldfire's Ytseradio show on Saturday. Kez, too, for that matter.
    I'd be wary of Doc Mosh's, though, considering the source... :)

    (Hey, I haven't made a smart remark about my fellow 'jammers since the
    post-Powermad stuff - I'm entitled!)

    Mike
    Division

    ------------------------------

    Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 15:29:14 -0800
    From: Lisa Marie <ytsegirl@pacbell.net>
    To: ytsejam@axnet.net
    Subject: Re: Go flames (No not Calgary)!
    Message-ID: <367993CA.29B484D5@pacbell.net>

    Jeremy Hallum wrote:
    >
    > > Again, refer to my previous post. It was a poll for the PM board,
    > > designed to reflect the opinions of the people on the board. It was not
    > > meant for the internet community in general. Just like KorgX3 pointed
    > > out... we wouldn't want subscribers of other mailing lists voting in our
    > > Ytsejam Top 98 award now would we?
    >
    > It depends, you know as well as I do, Lisa what happens when one
    > list mentions one band that many people don't like...they go apeshit
    > about it. On the Jam its that "M" band. On The Edge of Forever list,
    > it happens to be DT. So fucking what? You don't need to ride him with a
    > cat o nine tails over it. Let him have his fucking opinion for christ
    > sake...I think your taking it a bit overboard. I'm surprised that you
    > are digging it so deep for something so trivial, Jess. Someone piss in
    > your Post Toasties this morning?

    Oh that's right. I forgot I'm supposed to let others voice there
    opinion, and keep my mouth shut. So sorry.

    -- 
    Lisa Marie "Jessie"
    ytsegirl@pacbell.net
    http://www.dreamt.org/jessie
    _______________________________
    Ytsejam Radio on Real Audio
    http://www.dreamt.org/ytseradio
    

    ------------------------------

    Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 18:32:30 -0500 (EST) From: Rick Audet <Ytse@concentric.net> To: Multiple recipients of list <ytsejam@axnet.net> Subject: Mike Bahr saga Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.4.01.9812171827110.21092-100000@mariner.cris.com>

    Jeremy Hallum wrote:

    > Oh, and for those of you who have followed > the Mike Bahr saga over time will likely be interested in the following > webpage...pulled it off of alt.music.dream-theater.

    And that URL is..... ?

    -------

    ------------------------------

    Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 16:45:20 -0700 From: BILL HUSTON <HUSTON@IOMEGA.COM> To: ytsejam@axnet.net Subject: non musician Message-ID: <s6793522.023@IOMEGA.COM>

    Hey, In yjam 4510 someone asked about those on this list who are absolute non-musicians. (raises hand, and in full Horshack voice and glory, replies) OOHHH! OOOOHHHHH! OOOOOOOOHHH! MMEEE!! MMMEEEEEE! Never picked up any instrument in my life. Don't understand music theory. Don't care. I like what I listen to simply because I know what I like. Done. Simple as that. Not IMHO, fact.

    Wilmo

    ------------------------------

    Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 18:45:50 EST From: AnalogGal@aol.com To: ytsejam@axnet.net Subject: Non-musician jammers Message-ID: <a32fab13.367997ae@aol.com>

    Simon asked:

    << how many people on the 'Jam DON'T play an instrument of any sort (or even, just guitar or drums). And how many people actually listen to DT etc. just for the music? >>

    I'm one of those people who don't play any instruments. I love music, but I've never learned to play anything. Unless you count singing in the shower and pounding on the steering wheel of my car as musical ability. :) Go figure, huh? Recently, though, I decided to try and teach myself bass, and I have friend who attends Berkelee and he's willing to help me along. My Jedi Master! If anyone has any tips, I'm open to suggestions!

    "Hey Sanchez! Gooney goo-goo!" Christina http://dereksherinian.com

    ------------------------------

    Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 18:56:53 EST From: AnalogGal@aol.com To: ytsejam@axnet.net Subject: Re: Flames Ensue. Donning Asbestos Coat.... (re: PM Awards) Message-ID: <978fd2ad.36799a45@aol.com>

    Al, my new guru, declared:

    << It's a poll. A godforsaken poll. It's not law. Get over it. >>

    AAAAAAAAAAAAAMEN!!!!! Can I get a WITNESS?! Preach on, Brother Al! Preach on! :)

    "Screw the ozone. I need big hair!" Christina http://dereksherinian.com

    ------------------------------

    Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 16:03:15 -0800 (PST) From: <dthomas@best.com> To: Multiple recipients of list <ytsejam@axnet.net> Subject: Missing URL Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9812171601330.20223-100000@fpage2.ba.best.com>

    I don't know for sure, but I think the missing URL about Prism records is probably the following:

    http://www.goodnet.com/~emerald/

    ------------------------------

    Date: Thu, 17 Dec 1998 19:17:31 -0500 (EST) From: liquidrich@webtv.net To: anfel@hotmail.com, ceacct@carnival.com, claudiosousa@hotmail.com, Subject: Fwd: Fw: FW: Sick Message-ID: <23592-36799F1B-572@mailtod-121.bryant.webtv.net>

    --WebTV-Mail-670239417-299 Content-Type: Text/Plain; Charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

    I LOVE THIS JOKE!!! !!! !!!

    --WebTV-Mail-670239417-299 Content-Disposition: Inline Content-Type: Message/RFC822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit

    Received: from mailsorter-101.iap.bryant.webtv.net (209.240.198.91) by postoffice-121.bryant.webtv.net; Thu, 17 Dec 1998 03:49:54 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: <mcopper@worldnet.att.net> Received: from mtiwmhc04.worldnet.att.net (mtiwmhc04.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.39]) by mailsorter-101.iap.bryant.webtv.net (8.8.8/ms.graham.14Aug97) with ESMTP id DAA19506; Thu, 17 Dec 1998 03:49:54 -0800 (PST) Received: from default ([12.77.216.62]) by mtiwmhc04.worldnet.att.net (InterMail v03.02.05 118 121 101) with ESMTP id <19981217114952.FCSN19255@default> for <liquidrich@webtv.net>; Thu, 17 Dec 1998 11:49:52 +0000 Reply-To: <mcopper@worldnet.att.net> ]From: "Michael Copper" <mcopper@worldnet.att.net> To: "Richard Copper" <liquidrich@webtv.net> Subject: Fw: FW: Sick Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 21:17:28 -0600 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Priority: 3 X-Mailer: Microsoft Internet Mail 4.70.1162 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_01BE2939.7C0DB3A0" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <19981217114952.FCSN19255@default>

    This is a multi-part message in MIME format.

    ------=_NextPart_000_01BE2939.7C0DB3A0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    ---------- > From: BobG135@aol.com > To: mcopper@worldnet.att.net; Caribbob@aol.com; wthomas@dscr.dla.mil > Subject: Fwd: FW: Sick > Date: Wednesday, December 16, 1998 7:22 PM > > > ------=_NextPart_000_01BE2939.7C0DB3A0 Content-Type: message/rfc822 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

    Return-Path: <Samer.Kahook@WXSMS.com> Received: from relay30.mx.aol.com (relay30.mail.aol.com [172.31.109.30]) by air06.mail.aol.com (v53.27) with SMTP; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 08:43:14 -0500 Received: from mailserv.wxsms.com ([208.26.28.2]) by relay30.mx.aol.com (8.8.8/8.8.5/AOL-4.0.0) with ESMTP id IAA05280; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 08:42:53 -0500 (EST) Received: by mailserv.wxsms.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) id <YWLWASTX>; Wed, 16 Dec 1998 08:42:52 -0500 Message-ID: <923AF2F83953D211B70D00A0C97377F01643BC@mailserv.wxsms.com> ]From: Samer Kahook <Samer.Kahook@WXSMS.com> Subject: FW: Sick Date: Wed, 16 Dec 1998 08:42:52 -0500 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable

    Added by Sam: Disgusting too! > Subject:=09Sickness > > The construction company hires a new man. He was supposed to start work = on > a > Monday, but instead of showing up, he calls his boss. "I'm sick," he say= s. > The boss excuses him. The man shows up Tuesday morning and works > throughout the week, greatly impressing everyone with his diligence and > ability. > The next Monday, he once again calls his boss. "I'm sick," he says. The > boss > reluctantly excuses him, but notices that this is the second Monday in a > row. Once again, the man shows up Tuesday morning and works throughout t= he > week, even faster and better than the previous week. > The following Monday, he calls his boss again. "I'm sick." The boss > excuses him, but decides to call the man to task on Tuesday. Tuesday com= es > and as soon as the man shows up, the boss calls him into his office. "Wh= at > gives?" asks the boss. "I can see you're a hard worker, but you've only > been here three weeks and you've called in sick every Monday." > The man says, "Well, my sister is in a bad marriage and I go over to > console > her every Monday morning before work. One thing leads to another and we > end up making love all day long." > "Your sister!?!" says the boss. "That's disgusting!" > The man says, "I *told* you I was sick."

    ------=_NextPart_000_01BE2939.7C0DB3A0--

    --WebTV-Mail-670239417-299--

    ------------------------------

    End of YTSEJAM Digest 4511 **************************



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 18:09:35 EST