YTSEJAM Digest 4659

From:
Date: Mon Feb 08 1999 - 12:33:25 EST

  • Next message: : "YTSEJAM Digest 4660"

                                YTSEJAM Digest 4659

    Today's Topics:

      1) mac machines
     by Damon Fibraio <dfibraio@home.com>
      2) Boots
     by Calvin6S@aol.com
      3) Re: ideally...
     by Phil Carter <phil@usefulware.com>
      4) Two things
     by Andrew Coutermarsh <a_couter@oz.plymouth.edu>
      5) re: Open letter to the Calicrew!!!
     by Brian Hansen <bhansen10@yahoo.com>
      6) The Day's mumblings from above...
     by "Ambassador Nelaskon" <cyaron@mailcity.com>
      7) TONY HARNELL VOCAL RANGE
     by drussell29@juno.com
      8) I'm full of
     by "Rahul Ananda" <rananda@mcn.com>
      9) Jazzy Theater
     by "Rahul Ananda" <rananda@mcn.com>
     10) OIAL
     by "Steve Ferris" <stevo_14@hotmail.com>
     11) Re: OIAL
     by Andrew Coutermarsh <a_couter@oz.plymouth.edu>
     12) Home on the Range
     by Adam Barnhart <adamb@cfmc.com>
     13) Re: Jazzy Theater
     by Damon Fibraio <dfibraio@home.com>
     14) Bret Michaels & other 80's news-c'mon, I know you're curious!
     by JKorby1973@aol.com
     15) Re: DT-DS Anthology? | FAQ spoilers | lyrics | ideally
     by JamesAhab@aol.com
     16) TNT, OIAL, and I'm a little teapot, short and stout.
     by "Korg Ecksthrey" <korgx3@safelink.net>

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 17:33:25 -0500
    From: Damon Fibraio <dfibraio@home.com>
    To: ytsejam@axnet.net
    Subject: mac machines
    Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19990208173325.007e0ec0@mail.avnl1.nj.home.com>

    Well, this is better than flame wars.

    Anyway, here are my mac machine nightmare.

    The worst one being the mac machine with braille buttons, but a touch
    screen interface where the buttons for accessing the menus are. Like this
    is really going to help us out, folks. What about the machines where the
    braille is so worn down that it isn't readable. Or the ones where they are
    outdoors and always where the wind is blowing the hardest in the middle of
    winter so that your fingers are too numb to read the buttons. And of
    course, my favorite, the buttons are in braille, but the screen is still
    inprint and your receipt is still in print, so it still requires, to some
    degree, sighted help, unless you can memorize all the damn possibilities,
    which doesn't exactly work if they constantly upgrade the software.

    Whew, I need oxygen.

    ------------------------------

    Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 17:41:05 EST
    From: Calvin6S@aol.com
    To: ytsejam@axnet.net
    Subject: Boots
    Message-ID: <16ab4835.36bf6801@aol.com>

    > If anyone ever makes profits off of CD-Rs.. (which would likely be very
    > small)... perhaps they should think about pyutting someof the money asside
    > and sending it to the band :) Perhaps give some to JP and he will like
    > boots better!

    I am pretty sure JP could not accept (unless it was payed in cash :o). I
    think if he accepted, he has just profited outside of his record contract
    without permission from the record contract (of which the record contract will
    of course NEVER permit). Ever noticed the "xxx appears courtesy of xxxx" on
    an album when an artist records outside of his PRIMARY record label? Same
    idea.

    The main problem is the record companies in general. The business deal is
    struck as: Record label = employer / Recording artist = employee. In other
    words, the employee (artist) produces a product or report (CD/album) for the
    employer (label). Just like in any business, you can't get payed by an
    employer to do research (writing and recording songs) and then give that
    research to a competing employer (competing label - which is every label BUT
    the original label). It really is best to just think in BUSINESS terms.

    So you say the problem is that it should be Recording artist = employer /
    Record label = employee. Well, what makes an employer? The guy with the know
    how? Nope. The guy with ideas? Nope. The guy with the money? YES. The
    other things help, but what it comes down to is recording artists don't have
    the MONEY to record and promote their own album. So the record label provides
    the money, much like an advance. The big difference from a bank is that a
    record label doesn't sue the artist if the "loan" isn't repayed through sales.
    A bank would. That is why the record labels penny pinch with artists.
    Because for every SUCCESSFUL artist they have - there are 99 more UNSUCCESSFUL
    artists. I'm not siding with the record label, but sometimes you have to look
    at both sides. I still think the record labels play dirty.

    I would love to see DT getting proceeds from bootlegs, but I think it isn't as
    simple as the bootleggers sending a percentage to the band.

    ------------------------------

    Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 17:56:35 -0500
    From: Phil Carter <phil@usefulware.com>
    To: A Pleasant Shade of Ytse <ytsejam@axnet.net>
    Subject: Re: ideally...
    Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.19990208175635.006bb6fc@pop.usefulware.com>

    Greetings ye 'jamanoids...

    Madsman wrote:
    > I totally concur with Al... it's really rare that you hear a stunningly
    >real piano on a prog cd. I assume it's been done a lot, but that effects
    >tend to try and make piano sound like something it's not.

    Not much to argue about here, since I agree with both Madsman and Al. No
    matter how good an electronic piano sound is, it doesn't compare to a REAL
    Steinway grand.

    I think that's why I like Cairo so much. Quite aside from the fact that the
    entire band is built around Mark Robertson's vast keyboard wizardry,
    Robertson insists on using a real grand piano for his music. Go listen to
    "Ruins at Avalon's Gate" from the self-titled Cairo release, or "Valley of
    the Shadow" from "Conflict and Dreams".

    >I don't for a second expect that Jordan will use anything
    >buy Kurzweil gear.

    Jordan has stated several times that he will never use anything but
    Kurzweil. I would find that a bit disturbing if it weren't for the fact
    that he can make his Kurzweils dance on the head of a pin, sit up and beg,
    and deal cards. :)

    ta,
    Phil

    =========================================================
    Phil Carter -- phil@usefulware.com http://www.mindspring.com/~philcarter
    "Music washes away from the soul the dust of everyday life."
            -- Berthold Auerbach

    ------------------------------

    Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 18:02:38 -0500 (EST)
    From: Andrew Coutermarsh <a_couter@oz.plymouth.edu>
    To: Multiple recipients of list <ytsejam@axnet.net>
    Subject: Two things
    Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990208180035.25407A-100000@oz.plymouth.edu>

    On Mon, 8 Feb 1999, Christopher W. Ptacek wrote:
    > BCDADCBGBCDADCBF#

    Chirs, what the hell is this song? I tried humming the melody to myself,
    but without a rhythm I'm rather lost. Help me out!

    ----------

    I've been trying to figure this out to no avail. What is the piano riff
    that Derek plays in Lines in the Sand? I know that the first two notes
    are the two lowest D's on the piano, but after that... The right hand part
    starts on a G below middle C then jumps to the C... And after that, I lose
    it. Can anybody point me in the direction of this in notation or help me
    out or something? Thanks.

    -------------------------------------------------
    Andrew Coutermarsh
    a_couter@oz.plymouth.edu
    http://cout.ml.org/
    ICQ: 2513441
    -------------------------------------------------
    FOR SALE: One parachute, used but unopened. One
    small stain. Going VERY cheap.
    -------------------------------------------------

    ------------------------------

    Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 15:10:50 -0800 (PST)
    From: Brian Hansen <bhansen10@yahoo.com>
    To: ytsejam@axnet.net
    Subject: re: Open letter to the Calicrew!!!
    Message-ID: <19990208231051.21064.rocketmail@send103.yahoomail.com>

    Andreas Schaefer <jerry@muc.de> wrote:

    > I'd like to use this forum to thank all the guys that gave me such a
    nice
    > welcome in California! ...
    > As soon as I find my own place there will be a big
    ytsejam-housewarming
    > party - I'll keep you posted (that also means you Mark Stahl and
    Paul Fini).

    Glad you're enjoying sunny(?) California! Bet you never thought you'd
    be listening to a live band play disco and top 40! ;op

    Actually that was just a happy hour that got big, not a full
    "Calicrew" party. There's a "Calicrew" mailing list with a lot more
    people on it (not sure about the full address). You may want to get
    yourself added to it...as well as anyone else out there new to the jam
    or the SF Bay area.

    Who maintains that list?

    hasta, BH

    _________________________________________________________
    DO YOU YAHOO!?
    Get your free @yahoo.com address at http://mail.yahoo.com

    ------------------------------

    Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 23:53:06 -0000
    From: "Ambassador Nelaskon" <cyaron@mailcity.com>
    To: ytsejam@axnet.net
    Subject: The Day's mumblings from above...
    Message-ID: <IHFNBDNKMGPHBAAA@mailcity.com>

       Okay. Here are my responses to the last several jams.

    >>>I find the cycle interesting. We go from dysfunction in tracks 7 and 8 to happiness in track 9.Then we return to dysfunction in track 10. SDV kicks in, and the dysfunction continues and, perhaps, deepens. We have come out of turmoil. We have been inspired by someone who can turn a drop of water into an ocean. Then, we end up in isolation, arguably worse off than we started. It's a pessimistic mood here in" Awake," but it's beautifully presented.<<<

       I agree here fully. And I think that's intentional too. The Awake album DOES tell a story, and what's REALLY sad is how true it is in reality.

    ------------

    >>>You've never been more fooled if you say II is better than I! II is a
    result of I! :)
    The freak wrote Tubular Bells I on the age of 18 I think! :(( I don't
    get it, I just don't get it! When you listen the album you just can't
    comprehend how ca a human write that music!<<<

       Why not?

    But really, I heard TB2 first, and I thought it was cool. THEN I heard 1 and realized how much 2 was just a clone. Still, hear Tubular Bells III. It's not a clone. There's some really cool stuff on there, though I still think 1 is the almighty classic.

       Since when did the Ytsejam talk about my *other* style of music anyway? :)

    ------------

    >>>Those of you looking for a nice DT-friendly music magazine might find it interesting to pick up a copy of the UK mag 'HardRoxx', which is apparentlygoing to be distributed throughout 80 Towere Records stores in the USA.<<<

       Yeah. It's so DT-friendly because the woman you all hate, Nikki Brooks, pushes them so hard there and is the ONLY one getting DT into that magazine. But nobody here cares. It's just me.

    ------------

    >>>On the OIAL version of "Metropolis", what is the song they break into near theend (about 5:17)? It is some improv jam or is it a cover of another song?<<<

       QUIT asking that!!! It's been said SO many times.

    Okay, sorry. I asked too. After it was already dead. It's Freebird (by Skynyrd?) Anyway, it rocks out, but I don't listen to Skynyrd.

    ------------

       And I'm going to look in the Guiness book for myself. I was absolutely SURE that the record for vocal range was just over 4 octaves. NOBODY has a 7 octave range. That's the whole frigging piano. Absolutely impossible. That blue chick in The 5th Element didn't have 6+ octaves. The "Lovin You" chick doesn't have 6+ octaves. No way in Hell Mariah does. The best opera dudes are 4. No way can a person cover 7. (please no play-on words jokes)

       But I'll go look it up for myself. Then I'll tell you if I'm right or wrong. Either way, I still don't think lame-ass Mariah can do it.

    ------------

       Hey! Did you guys see that new Dax chick in DS9? Oh, my GOD!

    ------------

    See 'ya next jam!

    -Nelaskon ECA

    Get your FREE Email at http://mailcity.lycos.com
    Get your PERSONALIZED START PAGE at http://personal.lycos.com

    ------------------------------

    Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 18:53:40 -0500
    From: drussell29@juno.com
    To: ytsejam@axnet.net
    Subject: TONY HARNELL VOCAL RANGE
    Message-ID: <19990208.190050.-138107.2.drussell29@juno.com>

    Mr. Tony Harnell from TNT is in the Guiness Book Of World Records for
    having a vocal range of 8 octaves....I repeat 8 octaves.....if anyone has
    seen him live or has any TNT material....they will know this is
    true....please respond if you dare.

    Later On Homos
    ___________________________________________________________________
    You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
    Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com/getjuno.html
    or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]

    ------------------------------

    Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 15:57 -0800
    From: "Rahul Ananda" <rananda@mcn.com>
    To: "ytsejam@ax.com" <ytsejam@axnet.net>
    Subject: I'm full of
    Message-ID: <199902090010.QAA24459@knight.axnet.net>

         
         questions these days. I was listening to the radio at work
         and Led Zeppelin's "In the Evening" was played. During
         the guitar solo (the earlier part) Page makes this really
         insane guitar explosion kind of noise. I can't really
         describe it, but it sounds like he is physically reaching into
         the guitar and yanking out its colon. What the fuck is he
         doing there? 'Cause that's a really bitchin' sound.
         
         -Rahul Ananda

    ------------------------------

    Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 15:36 -0800
    From: "Rahul Ananda" <rananda@mcn.com>
    To: "ytsejam@ax.com" <ytsejam@axnet.net>
    Subject: Jazzy Theater
    Message-ID: <199902090010.QAA24460@knight.axnet.net>

         
         Chris Ptacek says: "it's really rare that you hear a stunningly real
         piano on a prog CD. I assume it's been done a lot..."
         
         This is weird to me but totally true. I, too, assumed that it's
         been done and keyboard players have seeking a piano sound that
         suits rock a bit more than the tonality of an actual piano, which seem
         to be confined more to jazz and classical. The trouble is, I can't
         think of an album in the prog realm with a real piano...though I'm not
         as much of a prog-head as some people on this list. Does anyone know
         specifically where real pianos or organs can be found? All I can
         think of is Rick Wakeman's church organ work on Going for the One, by
         Yes. Also, is that a real organ in the I Get Up I Get Down section of
         Close to the Edge? Because it sure as shit sounds like one and I
         don;t think they had keyboard sounds that sophisticated in the 70s.
         
         I've always thought DT could sound really great with a piano and
         JP playing jazz chords behind it, and JM doing some kind of walking
         bass line. Hell, let Mike throw a jazz ride pattern behind it
         and we might have their version of assymetric jazz ala Dave Brubeck
         or Dave Holland.
         
         Too bad they play Satan music, instead :)
         
         -Rahul Ananda

    ------------------------------

    Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 16:15:20 PST
    From: "Steve Ferris" <stevo_14@hotmail.com>
    To: ytsejam@axnet.net
    Subject: OIAL
    Message-ID: <19990209001520.28905.qmail@hotmail.com>

    Why isn't the symbol that's on every other release on the cover of
    OIAL???????????????????????????????????????????

    ______________________________________________________
    Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

    ------------------------------

    Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 19:46:47 -0500 (EST)
    From: Andrew Coutermarsh <a_couter@oz.plymouth.edu>
    To: Multiple recipients of list <ytsejam@axnet.net>
    Subject: Re: OIAL
    Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.3.96.990208193956.9000A-100000@oz.plymouth.edu>

    On Mon, 8 Feb 1999, Steve Ferris wrote:

    > Why isn't the symbol that's on every other release on the cover of
    > OIAL???????????????????????????????????????????

    You know, that's really a good question - Why ISN'T the Majesty symbol on
    the front cover of OiaLT? I can only say that it's probably because they
    have it on the BACK cover. I see a Majesty symbol on the front cover of
    Falling Into Infinity, but not on the back cover. I see a Majesty symbol
    on the front cover of ACoS, but not on the back cover. So maybe they
    decided to put it on the back of this album instead of the front cover
    because of the particular artwork that was being used. That's the best
    explanation I could think up.

    -------------------------------------------------
    Andrew Coutermarsh
    a_couter@oz.plymouth.edu
    http://cout.ml.org/
    ICQ: 2513441
    -------------------------------------------------
    Sometimes, when I would read a very good book,
    I would stop and thank my teacher. At least, I
    used to, until she got an unlisted number.
    -------------------------------------------------

    ------------------------------

    Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 16:54:25 -0800
    From: Adam Barnhart <adamb@cfmc.com>
    To: ytsejam@axnet.net
    Subject: Home on the Range
    Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19990208165425.006e7ba8@pop.cfmc.com>

    >From: Jon Parmet <jon@parmetpc.volpe.dot.gov>
    >Subject: Re: mariah carey & her self-cleaning vocal range
    >
    >Mariah who? :)))
    >
    >Back in the mid-late 70's, Minnie Ripperton hit an excruciatingly
    >painful note in a song called, IIRC, "Loving You." I'm sure there must
    >be a few people on here who remember this song and the absolute primal
    >agressions it would stir up?

    Yep. And Burger King's actually running that song in a commericial of
    theirs now. Painful, man...painful.

    >Imagine the alarm clock going off in the morning and this song comes on.
    >Now imagine the alarm clock in fully non-functional pieces :)
    >
    >That song actually pissed me off!
    >
    >I know nothing about comparing octave ranges but I'd hazard a guess that
    >Minnie had to be a good octave higher than the highest note I've ever
    >heard Mariah hit. There are some sounds that simply should be left in
    >the realm of silence; and on that note.... :)

    Actually, I heard a song of Mariah Carey's a couple of years back that
    really reminded me of "Loving You." It was very simple, in that she was
    "la la la"-ing sounds that only dolphins could hear. I don't know if it
    was THAT high, but if it wasn't, it was awfully close.

    Adam D. Barnhart
    adamb@cfmc.com
    ydnt85a@prodigy.com
    http://www.cfmc.com/adamb

    ------------------------------

    Date: Mon, 08 Feb 1999 20:28:32 -0500
    From: Damon Fibraio <dfibraio@home.com>
    To: ytsejam@axnet.net
    Subject: Re: Jazzy Theater
    Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19990208202832.007efa50@mail.avnl1.nj.home.com>

    if you listen to most any prog album from the 70s, any piano or organ you
    hear is authentic piano and organ. In fact, I am willing to bet that any
    authentic piano you hear in most 80s prog albums is just that. Not until
    the late 80s and early 90s when samples were easier to stick into keyboards
    is the line becoming blurrier and blurrier. Most Genesis albums use real
    organs and pianos upt hrough Wind and Wuthering, with the exception of the
    obviously electric pianos on Supper's ready, lamb lies down, trick of the
    tale and such. yes is always real piano for the most part. If it sounds
    really electric it is obviously not a piano. To my knowledge, Geddy Lee
    rarely used a real piano at all, let alone a real organ. Pink floyd? All
    those pianos in the 70s were real to me, except for the rhodes sounds which
    was a real rhodes. I would imagine that Derek and Kevin used real pianos in
    the studio for the albums, though.
    At 04:28 PM 2/8/1999 -0800, you wrote:
    >
    >
    > Chris Ptacek says: "it's really rare that you hear a stunningly real
    > piano on a prog CD. I assume it's been done a lot..."
    >
    > This is weird to me but totally true. I, too, assumed that it's
    > been done and keyboard players have seeking a piano sound that
    > suits rock a bit more than the tonality of an actual piano, which seem
    > to be confined more to jazz and classical. The trouble is, I can't
    > think of an album in the prog realm with a real piano...though I'm not
    > as much of a prog-head as some people on this list. Does anyone know
    > specifically where real pianos or organs can be found? All I can
    > think of is Rick Wakeman's church organ work on Going for the One, by
    > Yes. Also, is that a real organ in the I Get Up I Get Down section of
    > Close to the Edge? Because it sure as shit sounds like one and I
    > don;t think they had keyboard sounds that sophisticated in the 70s.
    >
    > I've always thought DT could sound really great with a piano and
    > JP playing jazz chords behind it, and JM doing some kind of walking
    > bass line. Hell, let Mike throw a jazz ride pattern behind it
    > and we might have their version of assymetric jazz ala Dave Brubeck
    > or Dave Holland.
    >
    > Too bad they play Satan music, instead :)
    >
    > -Rahul Ananda
    >

    ------------------------------

    Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 20:53:31 EST
    From: JKorby1973@aol.com
    To: ytsejam@axnet.net
    Subject: Bret Michaels & other 80's news-c'mon, I know you're curious!
    Message-ID: <e6e3e31e.36bf951b@aol.com>

    In a message dated 99-02-08 17:33:31 EST, you write:

    << Anybody listened to Bret Micheals knew one? Murder in death row? I saw
     it out. >>

    "A Letter From Death Row"
      This is Bret Michaels solo album, which is also the soundtrack to a movie
    that he wrote, directed, and starred in. It was basically an independent film,
    so if you haven't really heard of it, that's why. It also stars Martin and
    Charlie Sheen. The album is actually really good and quite different than
    anything he did in Poison. It's basically a rock album, but not really in an
    80's "big rock" vein. It's more reminicent of today's pop "rock" bands like
    Smash Mouth or something like that. He's also got some other movies coming out
    that he's either starred in or directed. One of which stars Mira Sorvino and
    Marlon Brando, to name a few. These movies are being put out by his production
    company called Sheen/Michaels Entertainment, which he's partners and good
    friends with Charlie Sheen. I heard Poison is gearing up for a big summer
    reunion tour starting Labor Day called "The Exiled From Mainstream Tour". So
    far, it looks like it may include Poison, Ratt, Great White, and
    Dokken-(who've just picked up Reb Beach to replace George Lynch). Other
    possible bands may be Def Leppard and Warrant. OK, I'm done ranting about 80's
    glam bands. But I feel I must add (before the inevitable flaming) that I'm a
    fan of this stuff because it's what was big when I was growing up through jr.
    high and high school, and they had some cool VH type solos which -hey, led me
    to find the real kickass guitar music like Vai, Satch, and of course our very
    own DREAM THEATER! Ok, ok. NOW I'm done. Later!
     Flame on,
        Justin

    ------------------------------

    Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 21:10:12 EST
    From: JamesAhab@aol.com
    To: ytsejam@axnet.net
    Subject: Re: DT-DS Anthology? | FAQ spoilers | lyrics | ideally
    Message-ID: <1b61caf7.36bf9904@aol.com>

    >< Why not do an anthology double CD of all of the Derek-era stuff that was
    unreleased (or at least, as much of it as will fit on a double CD)? And for
    that matter, it'd be pretty cool to hear some of the demos that never got to
    the studio. Songs like Speak To Me" have huge potential for Radio airplay, so
    why not release it properly? ><

    Because *that* would be the ultimate sell-out. Rather than progress and work
    on new songs and look towards the future, they do no work and throw together
    an album of already existing songs, throw some tag line on like "rare Dream
    Theater gems" or some shit, release it, make money, and get a single out of
    it. They have more integrity than to pull shit like that. Save it for the fan
    club CD.

    >< Part 3: A Crack In The Mirror from "Mind Control" bootleg! On trhis one
    Kevin is
    on keys right? After the piano sound solo, he changes the sound into more
    electirc,
    distorted AND he plays the first notes of Lines In The Sand!!!! What the ...
    ??? ><

    Of course that's Derek. Kevin didn't play any shows on the Awake tour.

    >< The question? Well I haven't read the story yet, but how come love is the
    final dance 'eternal', in "the only one". In my eyes 'death' is the eternal
    dance that is best described as eternal. "Love is the Dance of eternity"
    sounds very final to me. ><

    I guess the message is, love lasts forever, even after death. I guess.

    >< it's really rare that you hear a stunningly real piano on a prog cd. ><

    Doesn't Jon Oliva use a real piano? Honestly, I wouldn't know whether it's
    real or a keyboard unless I listen very closely, which I haven't, but I've
    never heard Savatage use keyboard sounds, so I'd assume he uses a piano.

    ------------------------------

    Date: Mon, 8 Feb 1999 19:26:35 -0700
    From: "Korg Ecksthrey" <korgx3@safelink.net>
    To: <ytsejam@axnet.net>
    Subject: TNT, OIAL, and I'm a little teapot, short and stout.
    Message-ID: <006201be53d3$acdfb720$4b0d84d0@default>

    >seen him live or has any TNT material....they will know this is
    >true....please respond if you dare.

    Hmmm... I know he has a huge range, but 8 octaves? wow... That's
    including super pinchy squeally falsettoing and such? If you count that
    crap I think I have about 4 octaves (and I almost have tonal control over
    those higher registers). I thought we were just counting actual vocal
    range. Most people don't talk falsetto unless they're crossdressing...

    > Why isn't the symbol that's on every other release on the cover of
    > OIAL???????????????????????????????????????????

    It's there. The little guy standing in the middle of the stadium has one
    tatooed just below his left nipple.

    >was a real rhodes. I would imagine that Derek and Kevin used real pianos in
    >the studio for the albums, though.

    I'm trying to remember back to the Live in Tokyo vid, but I'm pretty damn
    sure that when they were showing the studio clips, Kev was playing a real
    piano. (Surrounded? I can't remember) He was using a synth for the piano
    in Learning to Live, though... And wasn't that a real piano used for
    AnnaLee? I'm thinking it was because just as soon as Derek stop playing and
    the track fades out you can hear someone move a chair in the background, and
    I don't think that was from James' mic.

    >Later On Homos

    No, crossdressers...

    --
    KorgX3 wishes he could find Knights of the New Thunder on CD. :\
    

    ------------------------------

    End of YTSEJAM Digest 4659 **************************



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 18:09:42 EST