YTSEJAM digest 5194

From: ytsejam@torchsong.com
Date: Wed Nov 17 1999 - 19:43:36 EST

  • Next message: ytsejam@torchsong.com: "YTSEJAM digest 5193"

                                YTSEJAM Digest 5194

    Today's Topics:

      1) http://129.118.199.144:666/
     by MaxArbot@aol.com
      2) Staccato alone doth not a musician make.
     by "Korg Ecksthrey" <korgx3@safelink.net>
      3) Re: facts vs. opinion
     by Brad Plumb <bplumb@pi-r-squared.com>
      4) Re: To Stevie Z and the rest of the "Music Sucks" crew ;)
     by Janne Jokitalo <janne_jokitalo@yahoo.com>
      5) facts, opinions, etc.
     by Chris Oates <coates@objy.com>
      6) Re: Staccato alone doth not a musician make.
     by Andrew Coutermarsh <a_couter@oz.plymouth.edu>
      7) Re: Lars Ulrich
     by Fett2002@aol.com
      8) Re: YTSEJAM digest 5186
     by Janne Jokitalo <janne_jokitalo@yahoo.com>
      9) Re: YTSEJAM digest 5186
     by Janne Jokitalo <janne_jokitalo@yahoo.com>
     10) Re: humor-impairedness (was: re: imp. facts)
     by Janne Jokitalo <janne_jokitalo@yahoo.com>
     11) Re: Staccato alone doth not a musician make.
     by Janne Jokitalo <janne_jokitalo@yahoo.com>
     12) metal
     by Justin James <jsj0656@labs.tamu.edu>
     13) odd times signatures in Met1 / Met2
     by Holger Hoffmeister <Holger.Hoffmeister@gmx.de>
     14) Steve Morse website /\
     by Jon Parmet <jon@parmetpc.volpe.dot.gov>
     15) Lars U., Alex VH
     by Dan Wait <camera_i@yahoo.com>
     16) Re: Amorphis "Tuonela"
     by MTeiper@aol.com
     17) It's Alive, Igor!
     by MusicSnob@aol.com
     18) Shine on them crazy diamond
     by CyberDuke <duskob@mol.com.mk>
     19) Time signatures explained
     by Jon Kretschmer <jkretsch@indiana.edu>

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------

    Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 16:21:28 EST
    From: MaxArbot@aol.com
    To: ytsejam@torchsong.com
    Subject: http://129.118.199.144:666/
    Message-ID: <0.78b06cff.25647658@aol.com>

    My SHOUTcast server is up and running, and I encourage everyone to try it out
    and send requests, suggestions, comments, complaints, whatever to
    MetzaeRequests@aol.com

    <A HREF="http://129.118.199.144:666/">http://129.118.199.144:666/>

    Right now I'm playing a Dream Theater CD mix that I put together. And no,
    they aren't just a bunch of DT songs one right after the other. Here's the
    track list of the CD:
    1. The Killing Hand (intro)
    2. Lifting Shadows Off a Dream (extended mix)
    3. The Way It Used to Be
    4. Home
    5. Metropolis, Part 1
    6. The Dance of Eternity
    7. Peruvian Skies
    8. instruMENTAL (Dream Theater instrumental remix)
    9. Learning to Live (the long version)

    [eriC]

    ------------------------------

    Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 14:23:01 -0700
    From: "Korg Ecksthrey" <
    korgx3@safelink.net>
    To: <ytsejam@torchsong.com>
    Subject: Staccato alone doth not a musician make.
    Message-ID: <005001bf3141$f2868280$0201010a@meserver.meserver.com>

    >I don't dare giving example of ABSOLUTE things because I bet someone
    >will come up with some "democratic" view using his "freedom of speech"
    >to put me down. :)

    For an example of something absolute try the phrases "Death kills," "Pain
    hurts," "Sherry Lewis sucks," and "Got Milk?" The chances of finding anyone
    who disagrees with those statements are minimal, and should they rise up to
    confront you, send them my way and I will see to it that they are put to a
    swift, merciful death for the sake of preserving the human race (what's left
    of it anyway). Hopefully they haven't spawned lest I am forced to slay
    their progeny as well.

    >There would be some validity to this post if you could do one thing. Please
    >define the word musician. Thank you, please drive through.

    Definitions of musician:
    A) A person who has a lifetime subscription to one of the following
    publications: Guitar World, Guitar for the Practicing Musician, Keyboard
    magazine, Hit Parader, Rolling Stone, Better Horns and Gardens...
    B) A person who has calloused hands.
    C#) A person who shows signs of male pattern baldness.
    D#) A person who can correctly tell you in what key you flatulate..
    E) A person who know that sharp means "pointy" and flat means "pressed into
    a thin shape." Example: "I'm gonna flatten you like a fucking pancake,
    BOYEEEEEEE!!!!"
    F#) A person who owns more than 30 CD's or knows another person who does.
    G) A person with an unpronouncable last name. i.e.: Ptacek, N'degecello,
    Petrucci, Kuprij, Spears...
    A) A person who can count to four.

    --
    KorgX3 drives through pleasantly.
    NP: Lauren Christy - s/t
    

    ------------------------------

    Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 16:07:00 -0600 From: Brad Plumb <bplumb@pi-r-squared.com> To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: Re: facts vs. opinion Message-ID: <2.2.32.19991117220700.01667b28@pi-r-squared.com>

    At 12:04 PM 11/17/99 -0800, you wrote: > >I agree. Miles Davis is a jazz legend. I believe that is a fact. Do you >agree with CyberDuke's original post with the statement that Pat Metheny is >a jazz legend? I do not. That is my opinion. Oh shit, this is nuts!

    You're right, sometimes it can come up for debate... but hey, facts are debated all the time! Nuts, yes. But fun. ;)

    Palpatine Co Founder of NARF: The North Houston Anime Resistance Force, and Historian of Anime-no-kai "Thank God I'm an atheist" -Luis Bunel "What an incredible smell you've discovered" -Han Solo, Star Wars: A New Hope "He said I was crazy, and it's not true! Although I did try to burn his house down once..." - Werner Herzog regarding Klaus Kinski

    ------------------------------

    Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 13:53:14 -0800 (PST) From: Janne Jokitalo <janne_jokitalo@yahoo.com> To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: Re: To Stevie Z and the rest of the "Music Sucks" crew ;) Message-ID: <19991117215314.12291.rocketmail@web307.mail.yahoo.com>

    --- Marc van der Wal <M.R.van.der.Wal@cable.a2000.nl> wrote:

    > Am I the only one that likes all three of them??

    No, you're not. Count me in.

    > I admit that their styles are different from each other; they > emphasize > different aspects of music. But to me that's what Dream Theater is > all > about, their music is very diverse.

    Exactly. And if you think about it, none of their albums is like the others. That's so cool, adding diversity to their music. Just the same with diverse keyboardists.

    > I don't wanna turn this into another Kevin vs Derek vs Jordan thread. > I > just want to point out that the differences are not as dramatically > as > some people on this list tend to think.

    Well, if it isn't now, it sure will come, so don't worry...

    ===== Janne Jokitalo

    Boss Information: jaska@boss.fi Jyväskylä University: jajokita@st.jyu.fi Homepage: http://www.jyu.fi/~jajokita __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com

    ------------------------------

    Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 14:05:45 -0800 From: Chris Oates <coates@objy.com> To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: facts, opinions, etc. Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.19991117140545.00b68c30@objypop>

    > But then you use "something" to prove me wrong. Accoring your logic > Websters definition of opinion might be a personal opinion as well! :) > Expanding this concept, you can't prove anything right. No way. And > there you have it - chaos. And I'm sorry, but the universe doesn't work > that way.

    Actually, it does work that way. Webster's is an opinion of what words mean. And it is often wrong. Words change meaning faster than revisions of any book attempting do define them can keep up. A dictionary is only a collection of the commonly accepted meanings of a word. If I want to go around with my friends and call things we like "flab" the word means that for us (my friends and I) because we have agreed that that combination of sounds has that meaning. We are no less right than Webster's or the OED.

    The universe is chaos upon which we exert our collective opinions in order to create confortable beliefs we like to call facts.

    ~Chris

    (and no, I don't actually use "flab" to mean good, it's just a more or less random word I chose)

    ------------------------------

    Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 17:07:52 -0500 (EST) From: Andrew Coutermarsh <a_couter@oz.plymouth.edu> To: Multiple recipients of list <ytsejam@torchsong.com> Subject: Re: Staccato alone doth not a musician make. Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.10.9911171706560.77433-100000@oz.plymouth.edu>

    On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Korg Ecksthrey wrote:

    > Definitions of musician: > A) A person who has a lifetime subscription to one of the following > publications: Guitar World, Guitar for the Practicing Musician, Keyboard > magazine, Hit Parader, Rolling Stone, Better Horns and Gardens... > B) A person who has calloused hands. > C#) A person who shows signs of male pattern baldness. > D#) A person who can correctly tell you in what key you flatulate.. > E) A person who know that sharp means "pointy" and flat means "pressed into > a thin shape." Example: "I'm gonna flatten you like a fucking pancake, > BOYEEEEEEE!!!!" > F#) A person who owns more than 30 CD's or knows another person who does. > G) A person with an unpronouncable last name. i.e.: Ptacek, N'degecello, > Petrucci, Kuprij, Spears... > A) A person who can count to four.

    Here's another one: A person who knows that if Korg had written G# instead of G, he would have outlined his list in an A Lydian scale.

    ------------------------------------------------- Andrew Coutermarsh a_couter@mail.plymouth.edu http://cout.dhs.org/ Cloak on IRC ICQ: 2513441 ------------------------------------------------- Before you criticize somebody, walk a mile in his shoes. That way, when you DO criticize him, you'll be a mile away AND you'll have his shoes. -------------------------------------------------

    ------------------------------

    Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 17:18:51 EST From: Fett2002@aol.com To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: Re: Lars Ulrich Message-ID: <0.fba3fea4.256483cb@aol.com>

    MyrBones@aol.com wrote:...

    <<list. He just cant compare with top notch drummers like Lars Ulrich, Charlie

    <Hey, I can imagine that you are offended. Not saying if you are right or <wrong on the previous posts, but comparing MP to Lars Ulrich IS a joke. <Ulrich is known because he plays in a famous band (and because he talks a <lot, too :) ), but he would definitely NOT be known/popular without <Metallica. Furthermore, he IS a sloppy drummer. Ever been to a Lars Ulrich <drumclinic ? Me neither :) ... Anybody else an opinion on this ?

    <Take Care

    <HeinV

    <PS. I have almost all Metallica albums (even on vinyl !!!) except for the <last ones, of course.

    I gotta disagree with you here. Lars is an awesome drummer. Just because he doesn't have drum clinics doesn't mean he's a bad drummer. That's a rediculous thing to say. Also, I still don't get the negative recepton that Load and Reload have. If those albums were released by some new band that no one heard before, people would like them but just because they don't sound like what people's previous perception of Metallica was they're supposed to be bad? That's rediculous too. I for one applaud that they keep moving in new directions. I mean, on And Justice for All (an album which Lars' drumming is incredible by the way), they went as far as they could with the speed metal thing. And they certainly did not sell out on Load. If they wanted to just sell a ton of albums, al they would've had to do was basically write The Black Album over again like AC/DC keeps doing with Back in Black. -Mike

    ------------------------------

    Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 14:19:11 -0800 (PST) From: Janne Jokitalo <janne_jokitalo@yahoo.com> To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: Re: YTSEJAM digest 5186 Message-ID: <19991117221911.15480.rocketmail@web302.mail.yahoo.com>

    --- Sebast87@aol.com wrote: > > Hi! i'm a french member of the ytsejam and i have some problems with > time > signature... > Could you help me please? > here is what I understand : > 4/4 = 16 1/4 notes per measure

    4 / 4 = 4 times a 1/4 note per measure

    > 3/4 = 12 1/4 notes per measure

    3 / 4 = 3 times a 1/4 note per measure

    > Now i'm not sure about it : > 5/4 = 20 1/4 notes per measure

    5 / 4 = 5 times a 1/4 note per measure

    > now what i'm sure it's wrong : > 9/4 = 36 1/4 notes per measure.

    9 / 4 = 9 times a 1/4 per measure

    I guess that you mixed 16th notes with the 4th notes, it's like:

    4 / 4 = 16 1/16 notes per measure 4 1/16 notes per 1/4 note

    Here, imagine number 16 as a 16th note, number 4 as a 4th note, and | as a measure line (or whatever you call it), it goes like this:

    | 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 16 | 16 16 16 16... | 4 4 4 4 | 4

    That's the way it goes in 4 / 4, I'm sure we don't need to go further...

    > So, could you give many examples please (stuff like 9/6, 8/2, > 6/6, 8/3 > if it exists??!)

    I've seen 3 / 2, 5 / 2, so I guess it's (8/2) valid. But none of the others exist. Only time signatures like x/2, x/4, x/8, x/16, etc...exist. But I think I haven't seen any other sig's than the first three, however, I've seen only classical music sheets (just a few DT transcriptions) and thou' many classical composers used weird time sig's they mostly stuck with those...

    ===== Janne Jokitalo

    Boss Information: jaska@boss.fi Jyväskylä University: jajokita@st.jyu.fi Homepage: http://www.jyu.fi/~jajokita __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com

    ------------------------------

    Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 14:21:07 -0800 (PST) From: Janne Jokitalo <janne_jokitalo@yahoo.com> To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: Re: YTSEJAM digest 5186 Message-ID: <19991117222107.5025.rocketmail@web303.mail.yahoo.com>

    --- Sebast87@aol.com wrote:

    > Thank you and sorry if it seems really dumb, but i just began drum 4 > months > ago and i just know 4/4)

    Don't you worry about it, you gotta start somewhere, don't ya ? ;-)

    That really wasn't a dumb question, not at all.

    ===== Janne Jokitalo

    Boss Information: jaska@boss.fi Jyväskylä University: jajokita@st.jyu.fi Homepage: http://www.jyu.fi/~jajokita __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com

    ------------------------------

    Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 14:31:43 -0800 (PST) From: Janne Jokitalo <janne_jokitalo@yahoo.com> To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: Re: humor-impairedness (was: re: imp. facts) Message-ID: <19991117223143.4469.rocketmail@web306.mail.yahoo.com>

    --- Fran Brennan <okelnard@hotmail.com> wrote:

    > p.s. John Myung is just a big lizard in bass player's clothing. I > have > proof.

    Please please....don't hold 'em back !!! ;-)

    ===== Janne Jokitalo

    Boss Information: jaska@boss.fi Jyväskylä University: jajokita@st.jyu.fi Homepage: http://www.jyu.fi/~jajokita __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com

    ------------------------------

    Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 14:39:42 -0800 (PST) From: Janne Jokitalo <janne_jokitalo@yahoo.com> To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: Re: Staccato alone doth not a musician make. Message-ID: <19991117223942.13152.rocketmail@web308.mail.yahoo.com>

    --- Korg Ecksthrey <korgx3@safelink.net> wrote:

    Okay, I know this is against the common courtesy and all, but this time it's a must to quote the whole of the original post, since it's SO hilarious and funny ! Korg, you never seem to stop making me laugh...(even in the so-called serious posts you sometimes send...no, just kidding there...:)

    > >I don't dare giving example of ABSOLUTE things because I bet someone > >will come up with some "democratic" view using his "freedom of > speech" > >to put me down. :) > > For an example of something absolute try the phrases "Death kills," > "Pain > hurts," "Sherry Lewis sucks," and "Got Milk?" The chances of finding > anyone > who disagrees with those statements are minimal, and should they rise > up to > confront you, send them my way and I will see to it that they are put > to a > swift, merciful death for the sake of preserving the human race > (what's left > of it anyway). Hopefully they haven't spawned lest I am forced to > slay > their progeny as well. > > >There would be some validity to this post if you could do one thing. > Please > >define the word musician. Thank you, please drive through. > > Definitions of musician: > A) A person who has a lifetime subscription to one of the following > publications: Guitar World, Guitar for the Practicing Musician, > Keyboard > magazine, Hit Parader, Rolling Stone, Better Horns and Gardens... > B) A person who has calloused hands. > C#) A person who shows signs of male pattern baldness. > D#) A person who can correctly tell you in what key you flatulate.. > E) A person who know that sharp means "pointy" and flat means > "pressed into > a thin shape." Example: "I'm gonna flatten you like a fucking > pancake, > BOYEEEEEEE!!!!" > F#) A person who owns more than 30 CD's or knows another person who > does. > G) A person with an unpronouncable last name. i.e.: Ptacek, > N'degecello, > Petrucci, Kuprij, Spears... > A) A person who can count to four. > -- > KorgX3 drives through pleasantly. > NP: Lauren Christy - s/t > >

    ===== Janne Jokitalo

    Boss Information: jaska@boss.fi Jyväskylä University: jajokita@st.jyu.fi Homepage: http://www.jyu.fi/~jajokita __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com

    ------------------------------

    Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 16:46:22 -0800 From: Justin James <jsj0656@labs.tamu.edu> To: Ytsejam <ytsejam@torchsong.com> Subject: metal Message-ID: <38334C5E.BE6DEA8D@labs.tamu.edu>

    > Greetings...This is in no relevance to anything mentioned > previously (unless I don't know about it)...But, I'm a fairly new jammer, and > I was curious how prevalent metal is in each jammer's music collection? > I for one love all kinds of metal, including death and black. However I would guess that death and black fans on this list are rather in the minority. Usually really technical metal is pretty popular around here (such as Meshuggah). Have you heard Satyricon's new album Rebel Extravaganza? I hear that it's one of the most innovative black metal albums every made. Haven't heard it myself yet though.

    np: Primus all banjo performance (mp3)

    Justin James

    ------------------------------

    Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 20:54:46 +0100 From: Holger Hoffmeister <Holger.Hoffmeister@gmx.de> To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: odd times signatures in Met1 / Met2 Message-ID: <38330805.CB667EE0@gmx.de>

    > The rythymic reference I'm refering to first is one that Portnoy himself >explained in a clinic... he said that part of Met Pt 1 in the middle section >was in 5/8 5/8 7/8 5/8 7/8 5/8 5/8 7/8 in that order. I've heard this in >Met pt 2 - a direct quote rythymically, at least!

    In Rotterdam, he was asked, why he choosed this sequence. The answer was stunning. It is/ was his telefonnumber!

    ------------------------------

    Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 23:20:58 +0000 From: Jon Parmet <jon@parmetpc.volpe.dot.gov> To: Chuh Chuh Chuh Chia <ytsejam@torchsong.com> Subject: Steve Morse website /\ Message-ID: <3833385A.F7C1608C@parmetpc.volpe.dot.gov>

    Looks like the new and improved http://www.stevemorse.com has some MP3 short samples of both SMB and Dregs material. Check it out, Perhaps start with http://www.stevemorse.com/sound/brave.mp3 or http://www.stevemorse.com/sound/stressfest.mp3 ;)

    /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\

    Fact: that guitar playin' dude in the subway was there again yesterday. Supposition: he had some new material, too! Lie: he was stuck to the seat. Comments/Opinion: excellent distortion, impressive speed. people had weird looks on their faces, so it was workin' :) Fact: the money i tossed into his guitar case decreased in value during its downward flight.

    /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\

    Duke: > > From: Giannotti Nick > > > > Look at it this way: > > > > - L. Ron Hubbard is a prolific author. > > - L. Ron Hubbard wrote the definitive doctrine on religion, and > > the world doesn't need me to agree or disagree - THAT IS THAT! > > Who is the guy anyway? :) Don't know him.

    I know Nick. He's cool ;)

    Oh, yeah, BTW, Nick, the PS/2 monitor is pooched! Sparks started flying out of it. Of course, I had to mess around with the power chord afterwards, jamming the bitch in wiggling it around screaming/laughing "WORK, YOU GATES-IAN DRIVEN PIECE OF SHIT!" as more sparks flew out of it.

    > You see, it's science in basics. You HAVE TO TAKE refference point in > order to prove somehting. You have to start from something that is > absolute, true and go on from there. Otherwise you can't.

    Unless you're L. Ron Hubbard ;)

    > Yeah I see it now, it all comes down on the discussion "Is there > ANYTHING absolute in this universe or not?"

    Absolutely! heh

    > Afterall, it will all get cleared up eventually.

    I forget which jammer it was, but I liked the Douglas Adams quote in his sig:

    "There is a theory which states that if anyone discovers what the Universe is for and why it is here, it will instantly disappear and be replaced by something even more bizarre and inexplicable. There is another theory which states that this has already happened" -Douglas Adams

    ||s: > Well look at it this way. It is a FACT that the OPINION is held by the >large majority of jazz listeners that Miles Davis is a legend. You can >deny that and say it is your OPINION that Miles Davis is not a legend.

    Just to clear things up a little as only *I* can do (FACT), consider if someone is referred to as a "legend in their own mind." Is this FACT or OPINION? How can we be sure facts are nothing more than dried little puppy hallucinations we convince ourselves are real. Are we here right now? Is this all a dream?

    Go now, see ya.... Jon

    ------------------------------

    Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 15:21:12 -0800 (PST) From: Dan Wait <camera_i@yahoo.com> To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: Lars U., Alex VH Message-ID: <19991117232112.18942.rocketmail@web308.mail.yahoo.com>

    Lars Ulrich is good at one style. Metallica is good at one style. Has he ever recorded anything in any other style?

    Alex is a very good drummer, imo. The solo before 'Hot for Teacher' comes to mind. But although there are lots of good guitarists, there are a few (Vai, Satch, Petrucci (imo) etc) who are so far above the rest there's no comparison. And in the drum world, the likes of Peart and Portnoy are here. Alex VH is not.

    But I'm not a drummer, so take this with a grain of salt and some jalapeno seeds :) -Dan

    ===== "Let light surround you." __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com

    ------------------------------

    Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 18:28:39 EST From: MTeiper@aol.com To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: Re: Amorphis "Tuonela" Message-ID: <0.252d9547.25649427@aol.com>

    In a message dated 11/17/1999 11:20:00 AM Eastern Standard Time, Rogerio Brito writes:

    << Hummm... How is this album, Matt? Anything similar to the other ones? I have just been getting (again) into Amorphis (especially the space-ish, instrumental sections of their songs -- I really love the second part of "Brother Slayer" and I just wished it were longer).

    How does "Tuonela" compare to the "My Kantele" single? Is it death metal? Is it rock'n'roll with death metal vocals? Is it progressive rock with death metal vocals? Any comments would be more than appreciated. >>

    Hey Roger!

    The style of this album is hard to describe. But, like someone already mentioned, I would say it is different than the Brother-Slayer songs on "My Kantele". However, this is not to say that it is a return to their death metal days either. I will try to come up with somewhat of a description for you, though...

    I would say that this album is more guitar oriented than songs in the past, like on "Elegy" for example. I think this was mainly due to the fact that their keyboardist left the band. They got some other guy to play keys during the recording - I think it was just a session musician, but I could be wrong. (I don't have the CD with me right now - it's at work.) There are keys on the album, but they don't really take a forefront in any of the tunes. Rather, they're more atmospheric than anything. But it really works! It's awesome "moody" music... I can't really think of another word to describe this. It's a great mood setting album. I can put this on, close my eyes, and the next thing I know, it's 45 minutes later.

    But that's not to say that it's mellow either. (I know, it sounds like I'm contradicting myself. Like I said, it's hard to describe!) I wouldn't call it "prog" per se, I would call it somewhere between rock and metal with a few wild instruments thrown in there, like the other guy already mentioned. The biggest improvement over their past material is in the vocals department. The clean vocalist sings the ENTIRE album, and he does a great job. The previous growler singer now just plays guitar for them. The majority of the album, the clean guy sings very cleanly. Occasionally, they throw in a growl-type effect, but with the effect on the clean vocalist, it's nowhere near as deep and gutteral as their older vocals used to be. The "growl" vox are probably the most listenable I've ever heard of any "growled" vox.

    The songs are outstandingly written, with a bit more of a "commercial" feel to them. Maybe "commercial" isn't the right word... they are more "accessible" to people that may not already be into this sort of music. I would definitely recommend checking the album out. I absolutely love it... the opening track "The Way" may be the best song I've ever heard by these guys, and that's saying something because I WORSHIPPED "Elegy". I would think that if you like the non-death Amorphis, you'll love this album. To me, this album seems like exactly the album that they've been progressing and evolving to make. In the past it's seemed like the albums were great stepping stones to something bigger. With "Tuonela" it seems like they've arrived at what they were looking for. The songs sound totally confident, comfortable, and brilliantly performed.

    Well, sorry for the ramble, folks. Roger, I hope this helps. And to all you other Jammers out there, this is one HELL of a good album. Check it out!

    Laterz.... Matt T.

    NP: Amorphis "My Kantele"

    ------------------------------

    Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 18:34:15 EST From: MusicSnob@aol.com To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: It's Alive, Igor! Message-ID: <0.8837155.25649577@aol.com>

    Mr. First Place, ESPN Fantasy Football wrote:

    >I think how a vocalist sounds live really is the best to judge how good they >really are.

    Ok, I can agree with that statement. When I recommended that whoever that was listen to Alder's studio material, I wasn't suggesting that Ray sucked live, although I can understand where what I said could be interpreted as that. In my opinion (this section obviously doesn't apply to those people on the list who are too obstinate to actually agree that a dictionary just might be a good source for defining words), Alder live absolutely crushes LaBrie (Still Life vs. OIALT = Knockout for SL, IMO), I was just suggesting that someone who wasn't overly impressed with Ray's live performance might reconsider after having heard his studio output. Or not. You decide.

    NP: Ice Age - The Great (Dream Theater and Styx Rip-off) Divide

    Oops, that was another opinion, brought to you by the letter "O"

    Kevin

    ------------------------------

    Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 01:00:20 +0100 From: CyberDuke <duskob@mol.com.mk> To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: Shine on them crazy diamond Message-ID: <38334194.D8C34F4@mol.com.mk>

    > From: BloodMystX@aol.com > > I am so sick and tired of people worshiping MP.... > > This is a very subjective issue right here...But the words > in which you spoke are almost offensive in a way...

    A-ha, NOW we get upset! :) Yes, again we have personal "proves" for something which isn't true or the FACT that "MP is better drummer than Charlie Watts and the rest mentioned"!

    > I completely don't understand the reason behind the statement...

    Same as I don't understand the "reason" behind the guy bashing Gilmour.

    > From: "Ivan Navarro" <inavarro@mdo.net> > > You are right about potential for chaos and I agree that the universe > doesn't work without a basic set of rules to define our world.

    Well thank you, at least we got to somewhere! :)

    > Why are you ignoring the accepted reference (Webster) > for the definition of the word "opinion."

    I don't ignore the definition of "opinion". I'm against the concept that there are no objective and absolute facts FOR ALL people.

    He-he, ... let's use the oh so cute US constitution here: "Liberty and Justice FOR ALL!"

    A-ha, what's that now??? FOR ALL? Damn Lincoln (was he?), he can't possible think that liberty and justice is good for all folks? I mean, .. what's good for him might not be good for others ,right?

    </sarcasm>

    > SUBMIT DAMMIT! RESISTANCE IS FUTILE! ;-)

    "Never surrender, NEVER!" <Sean Connery waving his sword! Although he got stabbed right after>

    LOL

    > > Yeah I see it now, it all comes down on the discussion "Is there > > ANYTHING absolute in this universe or not?" > > Have you seen the Matrix? Cool concept.

    Oh c'mon Ivancho! :) You can do better than that! There are times for joking and times to be serious. (BTW, I didn't see the movie yet) An artist can imagine any kind of fiction in his movie/book. However cool it might sound (Heck I LOVE "The 5-th element" idea) but let's be realistic. Be honest and tell me you REALLY consider Matrix concept or any other that type of movie as serious candidate for THE TRUE nature of the universe?

    > Everything I thought of as absolute I'm sure could be argued against :-)

    No, don't surrender!! That's what they try man! :)

    > I agree. Miles Davis is a jazz legend. I believe that is a fact.

    Phew, and I thought that was easy thing to agree on! :( For God's sake, what kind of example I should think of to prove that some things ARE objective and absolute? :) OK I'm really tired of all this ... I made my point already

    ------------------------------

    Date: Wed, 17 Nov 1999 19:29:02 -0800 From: Jon Kretschmer <jkretsch@indiana.edu> To: ytsejam@torchsong.com Subject: Time signatures explained Message-ID: <3.0.6.32.19991117192902.007df100@imap.indiana.edu>

    >From: Sebast87@aol.com >Hi! i'm a french member of the ytsejam and i have some problems with time >signature... >Could you help me please?

    I'll do my best - You could probably find this info out somewhere online, but since there are so many musicians here, this is a good a place as any to get your questions answered about music theory. Here goes.

    >here is what I understand : >4/4 = 16 1/4 notes per measure >3/4 = 12 1/4 notes per measure

    If you mean to say that in 4/4 there are 16 quarter notes and that in 3/4 there are 3 quarter notes, that is incorrect. In 4/4 there are 4 quarter notes, and in 3/4 there are 3 quarter notes. There ARE, however, 16 eighth notes in 4/4 and 12 in 3/4, but those eighth notes do not receive the beat.

    In time signature notation, the bottom number refers to the LENGTH of the note that will receive the beat. Maybe this chart will help.

    If there is a 1 as the bottom number (x/1), then the whole note receives the beat. If there is a 2 as the bottom number (x/2), then the half note receives the beat. If there is a 4 as the bottom number, (x/4), then the quarter note receives the beat. If there is an 8 as the bottom number, (x/8), then the eighth note receives the beat. If there is a 16 as the bottom number, (x/16), then the sixteenth note receives the beat.

    IN CONVENTIONAL NOTATION, THE BOTTOM NUMBER CAN ONLY BE A POWER OF 2! :) No 3's, no 6's, no 9's, etc...Only 1,2,4,8,16,32,64,128,256, whatever on up, but it can only be a power of 2.

    The top number in time signature notation merely refers to how many of those half notes, quarter notes, eighth notes, etc, are in the bar.

    Whenever you see a time sig, look at the bottom number first to see what kind of note length you will be beating. Then look at the top note and see how many there are. Very simple, but easy to confuse the meaning of the top and bottom numbers.

    For instance, here is the meaning of the most common time sigs -

    In 2/2, there are 2 half notes per bar. In 3/2, there are 3 half notes per bar. In 4/2, there are 4 half notes per bar.

    In 2/4, there are 2 quarter notes per bar. In 3/4, there are 3 quarter notes per bar. In 4/4, there are 4 quarter notes per bar. In 5/4, there are 5 quarter notes per bar. In 6/4, there are 6 quarter notes per bar. etc...

    In 3/8, there are 3 eighth notes per bar. In 5/8, there are 5 eighth notes per bar.

    (Time sigs like 2/8, 4/8, 8/8 don't really receive much use because they can be reduced to 1/4, 2/4, and 4/4 respectively.)

    Now, the beauty of Dream Theater, as you probably know already, is that they DO NOT just stick to 4/4 and 3/4 as most bands do...They use all sorts of crazy time sigs that are HARD to count...The most famous example would probably be the 15/16 in the beginning of Learning to Live. Using the template I laid out earlier you can figure out exactly how to count the opening. I didn't say you WOULD be able to though, because it is HARD :) That is only part of what makes DT so great...Because Mike, John, John, Kevin and Jordan are MONSTERS at figuring out and playing in different time sigs

    So, now that that is out there, lets take a look at the questions you posed in your email -

    >Now i'm not sure about it : >5/4 = 20 1/4 notes per measure

    Not quite - 20 eighth notes, but 5 quarters in 5/4. Refer to the explanation above to understand why.

    >now what i'm sure it's wrong : >9/4 = 36 1/4 notes per measure.

    36 eighths, not quarters, but other than that, you have the math down.

    >Thank you and sorry if it seems really dumb, but i just began drum 4 months >ago and i just know 4/4)

    Keep listening to Dream Theater. You'll become comfortable with EVERY time signature if you learn each and every one of their songs well...

    Hope this helps. I know there are a lot of musicians on this list that know this stuff already, but I thought it could help some people. And as I recall, it isn't a taboo topic. So, there it is. Good luck.

    Jon

    ------------------------------

    End of YTSEJAM Digest 5194 **************************



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2b30 : Thu Apr 01 2004 - 19:07:52 EST